From how she looks... I would say most likely.
She has been pregnant before. She keeps having miscarriages though... so I am thinking that she doesnt want to come out and say she is pregnant and then lose the baby again. She already stated that she was pregnant with Tom's baby right before they got divorced, but she had a miscarriage. She may announce it in a couple more months after she gets out of the "miscarrying" phase.
Article from E! News Online from 2001:
The actress' Australian-based publicist has confirmed stories in the New York Daily News and supermarket tabloid the Star this week that Kidman was nearly three months pregnant when Tom Cruise filed for divorce last month. The Daily News and Star quote unnamed sources who claim the 33-year-old actress was pregnant at the time of the split and subsequently suffered a miscarriage.
"It is a private matter for Tom and Nicole to work out," Kidman's Aussie publicist, Wendy Day, is quoted in Sydney's Daily Telegraph. Day told the local Associated Press bureau, "I believe the story is out there and running. We can't deny the story."
Earlier, Kidman's Hollywood publicist, Toby Fleischman, refused to confirm or deny the miscarriage reports. "PMK is submitting no comment," Fleischman said. "We have not been commenting on any of these matters, as we wish to respect Ms. Kidman's privacy."
Cruise's publicist, Pat Kingsley, could not immediately be reached for comment.
Cruise, 38, filed for divorce February 7 after the pair separated in December, just shy of their 10-year anniversary. The couple--who blamed the split on "divergent careers which constantly kept them apart"--have two adopted children, Connor, 6, and Isabella, 8.
The Star claims in its report (on newsstands Friday) that Kidman suffered the miscarriage about two weeks ago and was treated at a Los Angeles clinic.
Meanwhile, an unnamed "friend" tells Daily News gossip columnist George Rush, "She's totally heartbroken. She's still recovering."
2006-09-30 14:17:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ashley P 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2016-04-25 04:39:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That rumor has been in the tabloids since before she married Keith Urban. Last I read, she is not pregnant! I wonder if she can even have kids- her and Tom Cruise adopted their children, but Tom and Katie had a baby, so his sperm must be fine!! Maybe she physically cannot have a baby!
2006-09-30 14:08:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by sloppyjo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't know for sure, but some of the pics look like she could be?? Lucky girl! Hope she's happy, since Tom is a crazy jerk and cheater!
2006-09-30 14:07:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joni P 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
I read something quit awhile back that she didn't want to give birth to any babies. That is why she adopted. I haven't heard that she changed her mind.
2006-09-30 14:11:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bwah-hah-hah-hah-hah! That would imply she was human, wouldn't it? Fat chance.
She hasn't made a decent movie in years (if ever) so I think it's all just a publicity stunt.
2006-09-30 14:07:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋