2006-09-30 13:43:27 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
SEX!
Not all men have big egos and not all men have children but ALL men LOVE AND WANT sex.
2006-09-30 13:52:03 · answer #1 · answered by I love my husband 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are a lot of women who don't manipulate men or other women at all. Using children as pawns would suggest more desperation then manipulation, a mans ego should always be pulled into check, as should a womans but you could be right about sex, I know this happens in some relationships, probably because it is a mans main weakness.
2006-10-01 22:03:19 · answer #2 · answered by rondavous 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sex, without a doubt. However, if a relationship fails, then the children. I think ego would only make men less compromising and harder to manipulate, if anything.
2006-09-30 13:46:32 · answer #3 · answered by woman_of_tomorrow 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, you certainly are carrying some heavy baggage. Your anger is directed at all women, Why?
Men are so insensitive to their surroundings and the events around them. No one can be manipulated unless they want to be.
Apparently your Machismo attitude has done you injustice and you are blaming a woman for it. Typical male, afraid of responsibility.
Your own actions have caused you this discourse. Ask yourself what did I do to deserve all of this. When you find the logical answer, you will realize you were not manipulated by sex, ego or children as hostages. You apparently have caused a rift in your relationship and are unwilling to admit you were wrong, thus the blaming of manipulation.
2006-10-01 03:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by CheryllDianne 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hi what Ive noticed about the men and boys in my life are that they like the women to pay attention to them and watch over them. My boyfriend Jamie loves his mother a lot and will do anything she says. With me all I have to do is smile at him and maybe sit real close to him and he becomes like putty. My dad and mom love each other a lot and once in a while they will give each other a certain look that I know means they want to be alone together. Even though they dont talk about sex in front of me or my brother I think that my mom loves my dad and wants to please him in a physical way whenever he gives her that special look. I have a fantasy about my wedding to Jamie and finally being able to give all of myself to him.
I think men and boys want a woman to love them. Love is a lot more than sex. I think its wrong to use children to manipulate anyone. Children should be shared by two people who love each other. Children dont belong to a parent but G-d only lends them as a sign of their devotion to each other.
2006-09-30 16:11:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A woman can't take children hostage unless she's using a weapon. A man's ego is too big to manipulate. A man can't get sex anywhere. The answer is food. You can get sex, ego-stroking and children as hostages from your ho.
2006-09-30 13:50:09 · answer #6 · answered by E 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I can see thru the ego strokes and if you've known a guy long enough to have his kids there is a whole different dynamic going. But sex is a tough one to get around. Guys really dig getting laid.
2006-09-30 13:55:35 · answer #7 · answered by CallMeDigitalBob 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends on the situation-these are not absolutes
sex: courting, keeping him interested IE when she feels jealous, when she wants something etc
that doesn't really take into account that she cares about him and well wants to sleep with him
the mans ego: once again courting, getting even, trying to help his self esteem
children: when she is upset with him and wants to get even
women can play dirty- but once again not absolute generalization
2006-09-30 13:54:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd say sex. If you get some guys so wrapped up in the thought that you might have sex with them, then you can get them to do pretty much anything.
2006-09-30 13:51:04 · answer #9 · answered by Jay 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sex, as that plays into the rest of it
2006-09-30 13:59:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋