2006-09-30 13:41:49 · 8 answers · asked by l 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
why bother, you wouldn't grasp it anyway.
2006-09-30 13:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This question (statement ? ) is incorrect. The government does not have a "killed in Iraq" classification. There was even a person added to the Vietnam Memorial wall last year or the year before from injuries he got approximately 30 years ago. The military usually reports " died in the line of duty" or "died from injuries sustained while in the line of duty", both which are treated the same way.
2006-09-30 20:57:09 · answer #2 · answered by Mike B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They probably are not counted as "killed in Iraq" since this would not be true - they are, however, counted as Iraq war casualties and added to the total killed as a result of the war, which is a far more accurate description.
2006-09-30 20:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they might not be counted as dying in Iraq but they are counted as wounded and dying in the War in Iraq. Or more like "another casualty of the war".
sad isnt it?
2006-09-30 20:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by Ness 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are they counted as casualties--or being wounded? The number of wounded is quite high in some estimates.
2006-09-30 20:46:25 · answer #5 · answered by Gremlin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tell any lie, and a few little air-head twats will belive it.
Shame on you.
Are you able to lie about your own country?
I'll bet you can't even tell the truth about your own country.
2006-09-30 20:46:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
And just where did you hear that little urban myth?
2006-09-30 20:49:45 · answer #7 · answered by cdguns75 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why, gosh, no I didn't. So?
2006-09-30 20:43:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋