Seems ole Henry is fighting the Vietnam war all over again. A failed politician now advising a failing president.
2006-09-30 13:35:34 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Kissinger, who served in the Nixon and Ford administrations, has been telling Bush and Cheney that “in Iraq, he declared very simply, ‘Victory is the only meaningful exit strategy.’”
And , he was the principal adviser to Nixon, then why didn't we win in Vietnam? Because we couldn't and we won't in Iraq either, there was supposed to be a gradual withdrawal after the Iraqi election. Bush had no plan, it's a war he screwed up and now we are told it will go on for years.
Kissinger was the goad to Nixon's great plans, why is he advising Bush. Recently saw a couple of pictures of Kissinger doing the nasty in his nose then nibbling. It was titled, Dr. Death digging for victory..again.
2006-09-30 14:51:59 · answer #1 · answered by saltydog 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you get into the detailed history of the Vietnam War, you will find out that Kissinger was instrumental in getting the U.S. out of the Vietnam War. He also made China into our ally, who was supporting North Vietnam while Johnson was President.
Frankly, it's about time Bush talked to someone that could give sound advice to get us out of Iraq before things get real ugly.
2006-09-30 21:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by MojaveDan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Shows how little you know. Kissinger was in the administration that managed to get us out of that war, not into it. It's a damn good sign that Bush finally turned to someone with real brains and experience to help us get out of this mess. You've apparently been listening to that O'Reilly blow-hard (when he's not doing phone sex, that is).
You jerk-offs that think Kissinger us too old and a has-been don't have a clue what this guy is really like - on your best day you'll never have one tenth his brains or ability.
2006-09-30 20:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by Grist 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
maybe, but at least president bush can gain the perspective of a policy maker that didn't achieve stated objective a few decades back.
many believe that the current president has not failed at all. citing (1) strength of economy, (2) low inflation rate, (3) low unemployment rate, (4) # of people around the world that can now vote or get an education (5) disarming of libya w/out firing a shot...on the otherhand, many cite failure thus far re (1) open borders, (2) north korea, (3) iran...but current president inhereted those disasters.
2006-09-30 20:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by mig 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It just proves George is as clueless as a rock. Henry K should have been put in jail a long time ago for the bombing of Cambodia with the other famous Republican Dick (Richard Milhous Nixon).
2006-09-30 20:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Too bad for bush Uncle K doesn't have have any good resume so far as war is concern,
2006-09-30 20:38:34 · answer #6 · answered by Robots 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
geeez....how old is Kissinger anyway? Maybe we need to get some of these old farts out of there and get some new YOUNG blood in there. Look at all those old dudes on the supreme court....making all these important decisions. it's scary.
2006-09-30 20:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's nice to the government hiring the handicapped
Go big Red Go
2006-09-30 20:56:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are very wrong... Kissinger is correct, we can not afford to lose (give up) as we did in 'Nam..
2006-09-30 20:55:16 · answer #9 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush listens to everyone, even the winey sissy democrats.
And then he decides what is best for the country.
THAT'S WHAT A PRESIDENT IS SUPPOSED TO DO.
2006-09-30 20:42:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋