2006-09-30 13:35:20 · 7 answers · asked by Aurred 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Most people do not have what it takes to lead themselves .
2006-09-30 13:40:40 · answer #1 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A prominent leader should lead the masses because no one from their ranks could be picked as one from themselves.
2006-09-30 20:39:29 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that IS the definition of "masses." Yes, indeedy. And would there be any leaders without followers? Or fish without water?
Bears without woods? No, indeedy.
2006-09-30 20:49:53 · answer #3 · answered by Grist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vladimir Lenin:
"A lie told often enough becomes accepted truth."
See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." George W Bush.
"BUSHLAND IS AN INSANE ASYLUM, TO WHICH THE OTHER PLANETS DEPORT THEIR
LUNATICS." --Voltaire (Memnon the Philosopher).
2006-09-30 20:41:13 · answer #4 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no they are usually poor or lower middle class poor...frustrated by governments who lie to them......Then Here He comes he politician with all the answers....The problem is you sell your soul to these people........poverty sucks...so does not having medical care , a good enuf job to buy the things that you need to get by day to day........
2006-09-30 20:40:34 · answer #5 · answered by cesare214 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I'll go ask the "masses."
Who are they, anyway?
2006-09-30 20:39:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a very well put question, but of course.
2006-09-30 20:39:51 · answer #7 · answered by icetender 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋