... should be known as a " Yahooer"?
2006-09-30 13:06:27 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No, rubbish name, any better ideas matey??
2006-09-30 13:13:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is already a noun, though derogatory. Yahoos were the human like animals in Swift's Gullivers Travels. They shared land with the Whinnim, which were intelligent horses.
If Yahoo is a verb in this case, then a person who Yahoo's would be a Yahooer.
If Yahoo is a subject, then a participant would be a Yahooist.
An expert in Yahoo would, therefore, be a Yahooologist.
One who writes for Yahoo woud be a Yahoographer or Yahooographist.
Or, you can just have fiun. I think there are already Yahooligans.
Anonymaous contributors could be Yahooever.
Cynical contributers would be Yahoop-de-do.
Miltary contributors would be Hooya
Confused users would be Hoorayers
2006-10-01 03:10:10 · answer #2 · answered by waycyber 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a true dyed in the wool yahooer person, with a wealth of knowledge.after saying that. I demand you refraise that question. right now.YAHYOO!!
2006-09-30 20:15:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO NOT A YAHOOER,
A SEEKER OF KNOWLEDGE,
A NEW BORN BABY,
A LEARNER OF A GREATER KNOWLEDGE,
A PERSON WHO KNOWS NOTHING NOTHING AND IS QUICK TO LEARN.
2006-09-30 20:13:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call me Misty.
2006-09-30 20:10:54 · answer #5 · answered by iusedtolooklikemyavatar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yahooooooo....
2006-09-30 22:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by Angela 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Masochist whould be a better lable
2006-09-30 20:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by IdahoMike 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call me what you want , but dont call me late for breakfast !!!
2006-09-30 20:08:34 · answer #8 · answered by Bill L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i suppose so lol
2006-09-30 20:09:48 · answer #9 · answered by Showaddywaddy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-09-30 20:07:32 · answer #10 · answered by Kango Man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋