English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Suppose the conductor is the only person riding on the train but he either is hearing-challenged or has fallen over with a heart attack and his hand is resting on the whistle. Hence, someone is there to hear the whistle, but he cannot hear it. Does it still make a sound, when it "sounds"?

2006-09-30 12:54:51 · 8 answers · asked by sokrates 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

8 answers

No.

In order for sound to exist, one must believe that it exists. If the conductor is aware he pulled the whistle cord, he believes the sound exists even though he cannot perceive it and so, to him, it exists. If he becomes unconscious, he cannot perceive the sound nor is he aware he pulled the whistle cord. Since he is unconscious, he cannot formulate the belief the whistle has been sounded and so the sound doesn't exist.

It's not so much a matter of perception that defines reality. Perception affects Belief, and it's Belief that defines Reality.

Does a falling tree, unheard in the deep forest, make a sound? It does if I believe it does (and I do).

2006-09-30 13:49:35 · answer #1 · answered by Adashi 3 · 0 0

i have not in any respect been on a convention in north u.s., even with if each and every time I listen the whistles late at nighttime i'm getting chills. I accept as true with you it quite is really of a romantic idea... I truly have even with the indisputable fact that been on a 12 hour trainride from Bangkok to Chiang Mai, Thailand - or maybe as that's no longer the classiest of digs, it develop into no longer primitive through any skill. because we offered the tickets about an hour earlier departure, there have been no extra rooms, even with the indisputable fact that the napping berths were more suitable than sufficient. And the comfortable rocking and white noise of the practice make it elementary to sleep - even with the indisputable fact that, because it develop into Thailand, there is not any longer a lot regulation on the practice and thanks to that, i finished up getting little or no sleep via a collection of about 10 thoughtless drunken American college kids whose conversations resembled each and every "profound" challenge you could imagine of once you're in college and attempting intellectualism. I truly have also ridden the practice through the Chunnel from London to Paris - which develop into very magnificent, and to the South of France in a napping automobile. My memories don't have any been those of a stylish eating automobile, or some thing remotely on the point of that - circuitously i imagine that in simple terms would not exist anymore.

2016-12-04 02:01:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No

A sound is physical vibrations moving through air. Our ears are able to translate those vibrations and interpret them. The whistle may blow, but if there is no hearing apparatus (like our ears) to receive it, we may say it made no sound. It simply made vibrations, like other vibrations.

2006-09-30 16:09:05 · answer #3 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 0 0

Not to the conductor.

2006-09-30 13:00:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Providing it works, yes.-Regardless if someone is around to hear it or not.

2006-09-30 13:54:01 · answer #5 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

All perception requires a perceiver, so I say NO.

*

2006-09-30 13:04:36 · answer #6 · answered by Heckel 3 · 0 0

yes

2006-09-30 13:01:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Does it make a sense?

2006-09-30 13:05:02 · answer #8 · answered by marikit _ako 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers