wwe is turning into a circus where the idea is to entertain the fans rather than to have a normal wrestling match where wrestlers do suplexes and body slams
when do you ever see a pure athletic wrestling match on wwe raw or even the ppv's without someone cheating or having an interferance type of scenario? wwe is running out of gimmicks because of the ******~up writers who get paid for absolutely nothing worthy, just think about it what has wwe done for the past two years other than bringing back retro's and creating the gayest gimmicks possible as you mentioned?
i admit, i didnt care very much for tna till my @ss got woken up by kurt angle's arrival there, i used to watch it every week since i like wrestling but i wasnt a true tna fan, i am a tna fan right now and feel free to call me a bandwagon jumper but who can blame me for that? wwe needs a a major reformation i every damn way possible and i will praise tna and bring down wwe wrestlers till i find a good enough reason to become a wwe fan again
2006-09-30 17:01:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Crude 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, who provides a smurf approximately gimmicks it extremely is wrestling, that's what concerns the WRESTLING. as nicely whats incorrect with their gimmicks besides? I dont sense sorry for the greater youthful skills they suck, and should not be the destiny yet on account that they're, we've little or no time left with a reliable WWF product. John Morrison is the only one you listed that could desire to have had a destiny. Tyson Kidd could desire to be the suitable wrestler if he have been in FCW, yet he isnt. JoMo quite have been given a semi push decrease back interior the beginning up of 2011 yet Melina screwed him. BQ - definite, they save firing all of their fantastic skills to hold it crappy beginners. BQ2 - nonetheless greater desirable than TNA extremely, yet they screwed Kane, which replace right into a dumb smurf concept. BQ3 - NO. simply by fact they replaced ROBERT Roodes gimmick which replace into the dumbest smurfin concept interior the international. word to the sensible
2016-12-12 18:05:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Male cheerleaders gimmick is a bit off, however it's a lot better than the DX gimmick which has been stop & started 3 times
2006-09-30 13:32:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad WWE writers. Most gimmicks are trial & error. If it works it works if it doesn't then it doesn't. Some of these stupid gimmicks are a little entertaining sometimes. You gotta admit - the japanese redneck is kinda funny.
2006-09-30 18:00:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris L 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Chinese cowboy? What are you talkin about? Jimmy Wang Yang isn't asian, he doesn't do no kung fu. He's a REEEDNEECK! He doesn't know where a japanese restaurant is! He ain't eatin' nothin' that ain't cooked in a barbeque pit! He's your boy! Giddy-up! Yee-haw!
In all seriousness he's actually Japanese.
I agree with you it is stupid which is why I laugh my *** off everytime he speaks!
2006-09-30 12:24:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok... y do u care so much... almost all that wrsetling stuff is fake.. half the time the person doesnt even get hurt... if u want real wrestling go to our skewl nd watch our wrestling team, will that get u off.. underage boys in tights
2006-09-30 15:25:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by big nasty nate 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree wwe sucks dude i mean cena is the worst wrestler with the worst gimmick. hbk and hhh rule but dx sucked now just like it did back in the 90's [NWO 4 LYFE] and the spirit squad man they r talented but the gimmick is ruining them, wwe GET NEW WRITERS
2006-09-30 11:24:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think they ran out of good story lines years ago.
2006-09-30 17:59:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dusty 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Half of time the writers are to blame.
2006-09-30 11:22:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
they have to put story lines and comedy and other junk in the show to get the maximum viewers out there to watch so they can make money.
i thought that was obvious, guess i was wrong
2006-09-30 11:24:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋