English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The head of al-Qaida in Iraq has admitted that Coalition forces have
killed 4,000 terrorists belonging to, or allied with, al-Qaida in
Operation Iraqi Freedom.

But wait, isn't Iraq supposed to be a distraction from the war on
terrorism? That's one of the many lies from the anti-war crowd who have
shamelessly tried to undermine the war effort.

2006-09-30 10:57:01 · 16 answers · asked by bushfan88 5 in Politics & Government Government

16 answers

Don't worry about making any good points about Iraq. The anti-war idiots will change that story into whatever they want to anyway. They are no different then the left-wing cowards that protested the Vietnam war.

Why don't they just admit that they are trying to ruin our government, giving aid to our enemies, and to afraid to fight a war. As I remember, in the years before 9/11, we were not in Iraq and still we were attacked.

One of your answers talk about civilians being killed, of course most are killed by terrorists. And wasn't it Saddam who was killing his own people. But I forgot the facts don't matter. Bush-haters are so amusing and so lame.

Bush-haters say that Bush said that Iraq was an imminent threat, which he DID NOT SAY. He said we need to go into Iraq BEFORE that country is an imminent threat. And isn't it funny how even the cowardly French said that Saddam had WMD's. As did most of the world. As did Bill Clinton and Hillary. Look to Bill Clinton's speech from 1998, I don't remember the exact date but he then said almost the exact same words as Bush did about Saddam. And, I suppose we provoked Saddam to attack Kuwait didn't we? I suppose we told him to use nerve gas on his own people? And surely Saddam didn't side with the terrorists, give them aid and comfort, and most surely he didn't give money to the suicide bombers in Gaza, and the West Bank. And wasn't it France that laid down and let the Nazi's occupy their country and they wanted to be the liberators of Paris, of course with Patton in the lead, in case anyone would get killed. And wasn't it France, Germany, and Russia that were profiting from pre-war Iraq?

Bush-haters are so out of touch with reality that they just say anything they feel like saying. Simple cowards, nothing else. But maybe they are hero's who would rather fight the terrorists here in the US instead of Iraq?

And, if neddie above, knows where Bin Laden is why doesn't she call Bush and collect the 25 million dollar reward?

2006-09-30 11:34:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Yeah, so who believes a message from Al Qaida terrorists? Only dumb conservatives who cling to any straws to try to con the people with brains (liberals) that the war in Iraq ISN'T the biggest mistake, besides slavery, in the U.S. history.

2006-10-02 15:08:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well... that's great...

but to be frank, I'm afraid they have a few hundred thousand terrorist "foot soldiers"... young impoverished boys with nothing to lose and don't know any better...

but they aren't the problem... the problem is those who are funding and training them and giving them all the crazy ideas... that's the source of terror, and I doubt more than 10 of that 4,000 are the actual trainers...

I mean, poor impoverished people may still dislike America, but what can they do with no money and no real knowledge of terrorism... nothing...

we hit Osama and the other officers of al-queda... that's going to put a huge crimp into anti-American terror... Israel is still got some problems, but we would be 10 times safer...

Osama's not in Iraq... and terror will never even start to end in iraq...

and really... we've lost like 3,000 in Iraq... so we're on almost a 1 to 1 ratio with the terrorists? that's horrible...

2006-09-30 18:36:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Here's the deal, all of the dems in congress are screaming that there was never a connection between al-queda and Iraq, so I want to know how are they going to explain 4,000 dead ones in Iraq.

I suppose they will say they weren't there before, but how would they know that unless they are collaborating with al-queda?

My guess is they will lie regardless, it seems to be all they can do.

2006-10-01 15:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 2

shamelessly,, Bush and the Republican party have created these al Qaeda forces,, Osama bin Laden the worlds #1 terrorist,, mastermind of the 9-11 attacks on America, more than 5 years ago,,, remains free in Pakistan on the Afghanistan border where he continues to train Taliban forces,,

2006-09-30 18:01:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Wow! 4,000! That's so great! And how many civillian casulties have we caused? Oh that's right, 110,000 and counting. So you don't belive a word al-Qaida has said this whole time and you denounce those who do, but suddenly when what they say something that helps your case you're willing to take it as a fact? Please, I don't think there is any room for hypocrits and warmongers here.

2006-09-30 18:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by quickblur 6 · 5 2

what does it matter how many terrorist are killed, they will never fully be destroyed, just like when you arrest one drug dealer and another pops up, it will never end, but certain people will profit from it in the mean time

2006-09-30 18:01:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Why does interested ALWAYS ask ignorant questions????
Maybe he was bullied as a child?

Can you post at least ONE intelligent question??????
No you say....Didn't think so!

2006-09-30 18:48:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

AL-QAEDA in IRAQ DID NOT EXIST UNTIL BUSH INVADED!

2006-10-01 17:15:17 · answer #9 · answered by wlday2002 2 · 1 0

You must be right, everything is going GREAT over there in Iraq.

2006-09-30 18:00:13 · answer #10 · answered by C J 4 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers