Who do you think was missing from the Romanov's mass grave? (Read my whole question.)?

Question

My opinion is that, since some scientists thought Marie was missing, and some thought Anastasia was missing, that they should have looked at the pelvis. THESE PEOPLE CALL THEMSELVES SCIENTISTS????????????????? More like blabbering idiots that like to contradict each other. Okay, I'll finish my point.

If the pelvis that might have been Anastasia's or Marie's was small, Anastasia would be missing because Marie was thin. But if the pelvis was larger, than Marie would be missing, because Anastasia was heavier. SO, HAS AAAANNYOOONNEE ever thought of that? And Anastasia was 5'2", and no one in the grave was that height. Plus, the Bolsheviks actually searched for Anastasia days after the execution because they claimed that they never saw her get buried. Plus, scientists compared facial structures, and no one had Anastasia's face. Therefore, I believe she was missing.

My questions are:

1.) Who do you think was missing?

2.) Aren't the scientists abselutely STUPID?

Thank you.....

Answer 1

You base your argument on scientific facial reconstruction and then say scientists are stupid.

So doesn't that make your argument stupid as it is based on the theorys and work of stupid people

Answer 2

I actually bothered to read that question too. You're saying that Anastasia was missing from the Romanov grave? Thats been a theory for decades about the potential survival of both Maria and Anastasia. There will always be spectulation about the Romanovs because of the way they died and unfortunately, conspiracy theorists will thrive off it.

So in answer to your question:

1) I dont know whether to presume which scientists are true, however since both debating sets of scientists have much more knowledge of the field then i, then i dont know who is missing. Quite frankly, I dont even care to be honest.

2) I know how dare these people call themselves scientists. Their doctorates must have been bought off eBay... O.o

BTW: Wikipedia can be wrong... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchess_Anastasia_Nikolaevna_of_Russia )

Answer 3

Anastasia she was shorter then them all and as you said none of the bodies were her height. I doubt she had a growth boom right before she died.
And yes the scientist are dumb they should really look more into it but I believe they're trying to hide their bloody, cruel, and unfair past. Thus they don't want to dig into it. When they moved the last Imperial family to the families place burial they named one of the bodies as Anastasia. Is something not fishy here?

Answer 4

I believe Anastasia and Alexis are missing from the grave. I don't think the scientist are stupid, its just that the czar's daughters were so close in age that its hard to tell their skeletons apart.

Answer 5

In this day and age I'm sure they COULD figure out which of the Imperial Princesses were missing. However, it has been so very very long that if either of them were able to be found, I highly doubt that they would be living. Why bother dredging up dark scary memories for them at their age anyway? There is not a crown that needs to be passed to the rightful heir here. Russia recieved its punishment for forcing Czar Nicholas to abdicate. Leave the family be, and let them rest in silence.

Answer 6

i can't believe i read the whole question. did you stop to think that maybe they've done it without telling you? or that someone can have a small frame but still be overweight?