temporary basis. I understand congress is reluctant to grant extreme powers to a president because the next president, from an opposing party might use those powers in a way that congress did not intend? Does the fact that Bush is being granted powers that are being written into law mean that there will never be another president from an opposing party?
2006-09-30 10:20:34 · 5 answers · asked by Lleh 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Republicans never were that good at planning for the future. Maybe they've started to realize that with all the fuel they use, and the Iraq stuff, there may not BE any future when the next presidential elections come around.
2006-09-30 13:34:34 · answer #1 · answered by ye_river_xiv 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
america shape, Article II, describes the powers granted the President of america. No different powers are lawful. maximum powers claimed by skill of Presidents are UNconstitutional and subsequently unlawful.
2016-12-12 18:04:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the original plan for was for the loser of the Presidential election to become the Vice President, thereby having both political parties represented at the highest level.
2006-09-30 10:29:10 · answer #3 · answered by Screwball 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
abramham lincoln was granted powers that none before him had and he assumed others without congress approval
2006-09-30 10:38:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
hmmm, i dunno sorry, let's wait for the next answers
2006-09-30 10:23:25 · answer #5 · answered by Fabulous, young and broke! 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋