time travel to the year 1800?
2006-09-30 10:15:50 · 16 answers · asked by martin48732 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No,
And the earth would be outside the solar system, killing virtually all life on it.
2006-09-30 10:19:48 · answer #1 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't believe so. You would be in the same situation but not in the same time. Also the other planets would be different as well(even the stars) If it were possible to do them too, for an instant, it would feel/look/taste/smell/sound the same as the time you had chosen. However you could only 'put' it that way for an instant. The chance which underlies the quantum mechanical nature of matter would mean that it would evolve differently. So e.g even if you could re-create 11:59 and 59 seconds on Dec 31st Dec 1799 it would be different immediately afterwards.
2006-09-30 10:32:35 · answer #2 · answered by peter w 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The year 1800 exists in and of itself throughout Eternity. So does the year 2006. !800 is not 2006. 2006 is not 1800. 1800 is not 1800. 2006 is not 2006.
2006-10-02 22:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by los 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The order of chaos accounts for both that which exist and that which is present but does not exist.
Chaos as God does not exist but is still present outside our universe and not existant of any material form.
It is from chos that all matter is formed and it is from chaos that a constant link feeds energy into our universe allowing it to forever more expand
Because the universe forever expands, since 1800 a far greater amount of energy exists spread over a greater expanse.
Because more energy exists in order to roll back the universe to that point we would have to collapse it in on itself this compression of energy would cause an explosion far greater than any atom bomb.
2006-09-30 11:35:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. It might look the same, but it won't BE the same. You've got to remember the human element. Even if the atoms in our bodies went back to their original places we would all be parts of plants, animals, space dust, and whatever else your ancestors physiologically ingested over the course of transgression.
Say, for instance, my atoms went back to where they were in 1800, they would be scattered all over the place. Oh yes. I would be around then (and I mean AROUND) but I don't think I would be in much of a position to make any observations.
2006-09-30 10:35:37 · answer #5 · answered by dudezoid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but no, but yeah, but no, but...
How do you view infinity? If time is cyclic - then sure, we can all go back to 1800. If time is linear, then No, we cannot 'go back'. What do we mean by 'go back'?
Infinty: a lot of numbers, right?
What about all the odd numbers? Or even numbers? Are they BOTH infinite subsets of infinity? Yet are they both not infinite?
Think before you ask a question, young SkyWalker!
2006-09-30 10:32:45 · answer #6 · answered by fruitbat7711 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the atoms of the earth is not what makes the earth. We are what makes the earth by our thoughts, sub conscious,unconscious and conscious. it is our thoughts that collapses the quantum field of energy that creates, not the the atoms
2006-09-30 10:45:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not exactly, because the atoms of the Sun, moon, and other parts of the universe would be as they are now.
2006-09-30 10:43:11 · answer #8 · answered by Source 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atoms trying to occupy space already occupied by other atoms?
End of all things.
2006-09-30 10:37:50 · answer #9 · answered by dirtyraincoatman 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only the matter would be the same, the souls have no mass so you have to be more specific to equal it to time travel
2006-09-30 10:38:52 · answer #10 · answered by class4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋