If it were a Democrat President who now wiretaps YOUR phone, spys on YOUR internet habits, arrests YOU at peace rallies, started a war cuz he wanted revenge on a bad man trying to kill a member of HIS family, took a suplus & gave YOUR future generations a massive deficit, & spends $448 billion on wars to kill innocent human beings...
Would you still be all for the wars
or would you be going ballistic
because a DEMOCRAT is doing all this?
2006-09-30 10:05:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Good question bunchik, none of the repuglicans answers that I have read attempt to answer, just attack you for asking it, are these the moral and upright citizens that voted for a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals. Heck a few even had to blame Clinton again. Sad that America has gotten so bad. Here is the deal they did attack Clinton for bombing the hell out of them. He couldn't brush his teeth without some repuglican wanting to investigate him and now they wonder why you and me and a few others go after their corrupt and criminal president that didn't even win the election without fraud.
2006-09-30 10:17:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Come on you know freaking well they would be bashing him.. Clinton's secretary of defence was a Republican, and he too said that Mr Clinton did what he could with what he had. The US didn't have a base of operations over there until 911. How could he have done with missiles what the Bush administration can't do with boots on the ground.over 5 years . He defended MR Clinton's actions after the USS Cole bombing, as having done what he could at the time but the Republicans Bushtians are still bashing his failed attempt, even in responses to this question.. So there is your answer.
The Republican approach to everything is military power, as if it is the only solution.. Bomb and kill everyone that disagrees. That is un American. True freedom is doing what you want to do.. Having to agree with the US on everything for fear of your life is dictatorship.. What are your really trying to spread? Is it freedom only if you agree with the US? Because Nazi Germany thought the same way as well..
2006-09-30 17:25:19 · answer #2 · answered by Shawn S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe these things are the right things to do...I would support them no matter what letter fell after their name.
To correct a few of your misnomers:
My phone won't be tapped, my internet habits won't be watched...I don't have anything to hide or be ashamed of.
The terrorists had declared war on us long before 9/11...we took the war to them instead of waiting for a strike on our soil.
Taxes had to be cut to keep us out of a recession grandfathered in from the Clinton era and the 9/11 attacks. Military spending also had to increase to keep our country safe. The deficit is unfortunate, but it's a necessary evil at this point in time. If you would like to sacrifice some social welfare programs to balance the budget, then let's have at it.
2006-09-30 18:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by asafam23 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Based on, Star G's, answer it looks like you will not get an honest answer. Actually when you consider who is running the nation (the culture and not the party) if Clinton had started these wars then they would be as supportive. We have a generation of War mongers out there. Their heads are filled with tails of the glory of WWII (from their dads) and they are vexed by the loss on Vietnam. They are bent on the glory of a world War.
2006-09-30 17:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you don't think they weren't doing this long before President Bush came into office you are pretty darn naive. We would have backed any president who had the back bone to stand up and fight for this country. Clinton was obviously not that person.
2006-09-30 17:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nah, they would be going crazy, bashing the President. I am a liberal and Democrat too, and I would as well. I don't support him not because of his party afiliation, but because of the apparent negative repercussions of his policies, and his lack of individual morals or ethics.
2006-09-30 17:18:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Had Clinton had a little more backbone, and gone into Afganistan to get bin-laden, 9/11 probably never wouldhave happened.
I much rather have a president who is attempting to do something (and I don't agree with everythng), than one who's biggest worry is trying to keep his wife from finding out he's banging the interns!!!
2006-09-30 17:09:18 · answer #7 · answered by Star G 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You really shouldn't expect to get a decent answer from a Republican if you are being a jerk asking it.
2006-09-30 17:08:26 · answer #8 · answered by Luekas 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What is your point, if there is one?
2006-09-30 17:08:47 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋