No it's Rahul who should be slapped and kicked out of Indian team once for all. These dirty S. Indians don't know how to respect great players.
2006-10-01 04:26:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has been given many chances before .So Ganguly should
be kicked out from the team. And if you are thinking about experience then Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar is much experienced also.
2006-10-01 00:59:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lisa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The term "Kicked out" is very harsh and not at all fair. If he performs better than others presently in the Indian Team, he should be definitely considered. If his performance in the coming matches is ot at all satisfactory, he should not be considered.
2006-10-01 10:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no!
he must be given one more chance!every player cannot be ousted from the team forever just for bad form from 2 years!
i agree that he is ousted for a period of time till he gets back in his form but ousting him forever is not good at all!!
if you wanna get any info on ganguly then click here-
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/india/content/player/28779.html
2006-10-03 06:22:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by aki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No i thin he should come back to the TEAM INDIA adn play. He is good, soemtimes ppl make mistakes, but we still won. and he didn't take sTUFF from australia. he was a good captain. It was then we did realyl well.
2006-09-30 19:00:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by scshah123 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he should surely be given a chance atleast for a series. After that they can decide. But who cares for him now.
2006-09-30 21:19:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by chunnu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope. its like beckham for engalnd gud player but not needed at the moment
2006-09-30 17:04:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sandeep D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-10-03 01:44:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. should be given more chances.
2006-09-30 16:10:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Imtiaz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes he should be he isn't performing
2006-10-04 06:17:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by abcde a 2
·
0⤊
0⤋