English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

Origin of this world?
Absolute Zero (Dimensionless) or Infinity (eternal, formless) State of energy or matter is the origin of this world. It is a state of matrix or energy, which is beyond our imagination. Our mind or intellects can only understand the language of science (length, breadth, height, time, space) or language of discrimination (positive and negative, love and hate, pleasure and pain, and the many conceptual pairs of opposites, through the duality of subject and its object). The state of Oneness and nothingness (Absolute Zero or infinity) is beyond our logic.

The very basic concept is, we cannot differentiate, distinguish and discriminate between matter and energy. Matter itself is a manifestation of energy. There is not a single particle in this universe, which is without energy and contains only matter. Energy has its basic two forms i.e. inactive (vacuum, passive) and active.

When Energy is at its inactive form it is at absolute Zero state and when comes to active form, it gets manifested into five basic elements (Agni, Vaayu, Jala, Akash and Pruthvi) of universe and then with the help of these elements whole world gets visible to our logic mind. With the help of our five senses, which are the representatives of the basic elements of the universe, we can able to see, feel, taste, smell and hear the physical world. If our senses stops working than whole universe will gets back to its Absolute zero state.

This is what is happening in Meta physics.
First Scientists said when they had come to the atom, ”Now this is the ultimate; it cannot be divided any more.” Then they also divided the atom. Then they came to electrons: ”Now it cannot be divided any more.” Now they have divided that too. Now they have come to nothingness (Absolute zero), now they don’t know what has come. Division, division, division, and a point have come in modern physics where matter has completely disappeared. Modern physics has reached via matter, and the Vedas have reached to the same point via consciousness.

2006-09-30 08:48:41 · 10 answers · asked by temptations_irresistible1 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

10 answers

Yes, although I wouldn't put it exactly the same way.

I agree that physics has successively divided "matter", to a point where we now question what it is that we have arrived at. I do not believe that what our current best science (super-string theory is one candidate) has to say is even remotely final (or even convincing).

Science is currently incapable of performing experiments that verify ANY of the latest theories regarding the "ultimate building blocks" of reality. These theories are more philosophy than science, since they can't meet this basic scientific standard of objectivity.

I also agree that religious thought, especially that of the Vedas (or Buddhism) have intuitively grasped something about reality that science has yet to admit to. I am convinced that as long as we devise experiments capable of doing so, we will always be able to divide "matter" into smaller sub-components--without end.

I feel there is very strong evidence for this. In the first place, observe that for as long as we have been capable of doing so, all matter has been divisible. Our theories always (eventually) fail to explain something about the way "matter" operates, at which point we discover smaller "particles" which seem to explain what is going on. Soon, mysteries crop up within this new realm of particles, and we then go on to discover even smaller particles, which do a better job of explaining reality.

Each time we discover a smaller level of "particles", we develop a more finely "accurate" theory, capable of more accurate predictions. None of them last forever.

When we consider the fact that size is relative (the universe is only "large" relative to us, atoms are only "small" relative to us, etc.), then there is no reason to believe that we are at some privileged size, where the "smallest" particles "just so happen to be" right at the point where we can't observe any further. Statistically, given the incredible number of "levels" (both above and below us) that we have observed, we should realize that it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the smallest observable "particles" (or strings, or whatever) just so happen to be the truly "smallest" objects.

In my opinion, these considerations and others lead me to the conclusion that reality is infinitely divisible. There is no ultimate building block, and in a sense this is like nothingness.

Yes, I more or less agree with what you're saying. However I would qualify this. I don't believe that physics has actually "reached" it's final destination. I don't think it ever will.

2006-09-30 09:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jon 3 · 0 0

In parts yes, in whole no. This looks like a chaos theory which always bothers me because the beginning and the end are always the same but with no reason, so, why should we accept the hypothesis?

2006-09-30 16:02:56 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0 0

Through deep meditational practices we actually find the nature of the mind and consciousness. When Christ said, "In my Father's house there are many mansions," he was referring directly to the many levels of consciousness within the human mind.

Traditional Western Psychology, as an example will break down the mind very simply

In accurately exploring the mind thoroughly in Metaphysics, the mind may be broken down to levels

The experiencing of the innermost state of mind, or Cosmic Consciousness, has the greatest life transforming power in an individual's life. Whether a Buddhist describes it as Nirvana, or a Christian mystic as God, there is one essential impact upon human consciousness that creates the greatest advancement toward healthy and aware mental living; i.e., that all who have experienced this state of mind within themselves, regardless of secular descriptions, agree that the experience itself is one of "UNIVERSAL ONENESS." Why, then, is this the most important of all of life's mental experiences?

In the classical Western psychological approach to the mind, if a person is neurotic and seeks help, the approach is as follows: The person is deemed neurotic because of having difficulties in associating with their exterior environment. The libido (life-force) is not connecting with the exterior environment. A gap exists between the person's sense of identity and identification symbols in their exterior environment.

As can be seen from the preceding , a person who is neurotic in the traditional psychological sense cannot connect with the world immediately around them. They withdraw into themselves and create a fantasyland in the personal subconscious levels of their minds as an escape from coping with the environmental reality. They have set up a state of psychic isolation between themselves and their environment. To protect themselves, all manner of defense mechanisms are set up so as not to allow outside occurrences to interfere with the inner escape.

Defense mechanisms can translate themselves into hostility, antisocial behavior, role and game playing with others, etc., etc. In extreme cases the libido is so reversed back into the unconscious levels of the mind that the uncontrollable, powerful forces of the collective unconscious flood the conscious mind, and the result is that neurosis has become psychosis.

Western Psychology's answer to this problem, as simply stated as possible, is as follows: Through psychotherapy, one establishes an identity within oneself that is equal to the common denominator of identity in the social structure (outer environment) in which the individual must function.

2006-09-30 18:18:26 · answer #3 · answered by Ayman 3 · 0 0

correct

except you didnt mention that that absolute zero/infinity is us, is the true self - the singularity is us - and we can experience it

see my other answers

realisation is experience of the truth, which is that we are, all of us, each of us, sole emperor of the universe - and we can experience it

2006-09-30 20:17:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So what else do the Rice Krispies in your head tell you?

2006-09-30 15:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by GreenHornet 5 · 0 0

Wow, you really had allot to say, but I don't think you feel better for getting it out.

2006-09-30 15:52:46 · answer #6 · answered by scornedgypsy 3 · 0 0

i agree to vedas ...abt what they have to say.....requires a deep understanding .....and yes they are veeeeeeerrrrrrrrryyyyyyyy logical too :) science too is doing it's job.....

2006-09-30 18:03:37 · answer #7 · answered by vek14 3 · 0 0

pardon me sir but ... its too long and ...... its tooooooo much for me to comprehend in just one reading ... but ... i don't know... i hope you get the best answer...to what ever your query is .... uppppssss ... toooo looonnnnggg

2006-09-30 20:25:09 · answer #8 · answered by marikit _ako 2 · 0 0

What??

2006-09-30 17:29:38 · answer #9 · answered by belle 3 · 0 0

"this is your brain on drugs"...

2006-09-30 19:01:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers