2006-09-30 08:37:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No
It remains open all the time to interpretation
It should be closed to alteration
2006-09-30 08:38:55 · answer #1 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's the point of altering it when they don't even abide by it in the first place. Freedom of speech, gone, but not forgotten. Freedom of religion, ONLY if you're a Christian. Freedom of the press, try freedom of RE-press. Freedom to petition the government, only if you want to be put on a watch list. Freedom to peacibly assemble, not without a permit. I could go on, but I think my point is made.
2006-09-30 15:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by kveldulfgondlir 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only for very important reasons. In the 200 + years of the constitution it has been amended very few times.
2006-09-30 15:40:32 · answer #3 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if the alteration gives more power and freedom to the people, and reduces the governments power and control.
2006-09-30 15:43:17 · answer #4 · answered by Gudelos 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It has to be. The Constitution was written over 200 years ago. A lot of cultural and moral values change. If we didn't ammend it we'd still have the culture of Victorian America.
2006-09-30 15:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by The Savage Jaw 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes. a lot has changed since it was written. I think we should change many things about it.
2006-09-30 15:39:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋