2006-09-30 08:35:56 · 18 answers · asked by BWLJ 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
He wouldn't have to be, because they wouldn't have rubber-stamped all his nutty ideas like Congress has been doing under the Republicans.
Also, the Democrats aren't so fast on the impeachment draw as the Republicans are.
2006-09-30 08:38:38 · answer #1 · answered by Nosy Parker 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Can you say President Cheney?
Of course Bush would not be impeached..., though the Clintonite forces who are spearheading this impeachment campaign want Bush impeached to keep Clinton company - Clinton as the only president since, and besides Andrew Johnson impeached. (Clinton WAS impeached) - just not house voted out of office for the same reason: the Vice-President would then become President.
Can you say President Gore?
Also; it has to be proven that the President broke laws before there are grounds for impeachment (Clinton lied to a Grand Jury -of all things!) and you would have to look far and hard before you find laws that Bush broke, if any at all!
President Bush did not lie to Americans, there were many Intelligent agencies who backed up what he told us at the time, (German, French, and British Intelligent agencies come to mind). That does not make it a lie (or broken laws) if the information was not as extensive, or verified, as previously thought. What were the professionals saying? They were saying Hussein had WMD's! Could we take the chance that he didn't have WMD's? The information that Iraq had WMD's had gone on for years - from various Intelligent agencies!
(Where were you when YOU thought there were WMD's?) Complain only now that you look back in 20/20 hindsight! Why?
You are brainwashed by the Osama Bin Laden sympathizing Democrats of impeachment thoughts and that is why you are asking this question.
Also, as much as you hate it, the Iraq war was LEGAL... Hussein had broken 17 UN resolutions of compliance so there were legal grounds after even 1 such infraction. USA forces have been in North Iraq since the Desert Storm conflict and the Iraqi Revolutionary Guards had been firing on American pilots and injuring, (if not killing) Americans since 1991!
If you agree with the decision to take the fight to the Islamic psychos or not, you are allowed to complain about Bush, though wouldn't it be better if you can be some kind of positive force?
Not one attack on US soil in five years compared to 5 attacks in 8 years under Clinton (would you like me to list them?) means to me that SOMETHING..., something..., is being done correctly!
Perhaps not..., but hey..., maybe next president!
2006-09-30 09:23:50 · answer #2 · answered by Number1son 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, no.
The Democrats are free to talk big and bluster about impeachment and vague accusations of impeachable offenses, since they are in the minority, but if they got the majority, they'd have to put up or shut up. They couldn't get away with talking impeachment without producing a Bill of Impeachment if they had the power.
The fact is that there have been no acts even remotely justifying impeachment and they know it. They're just pandering to the "hate Bush" crowd who haven't the faintest idea what the Constitution says on impeachment, but they know they haven't got any crimes.
Remember, the same people who are talking impeachment are saying that the USSC appointed Bush in 2000, but the opinions that show that this is absolutely false are easily found on the Net. If they try to impeach, they're going to come out looking stupid to more people than they already do.
2006-09-30 08:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How could you impeach President Bush? He hasn't done anything illegal. But, knowing the dems, they might try and make fools of themselves. They haven't come up with one idea of how to help the country. All they ever do is go after the republicans, that's all they know how to do. It's about time they start thinking about the American people, instead of how do I get power back..
2006-09-30 09:03:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would be irrelevant. Political parties are merely an illusion. Bush and other presidents are elected ONLY by THIS secret and evil group that's been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-09-30 16:52:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You haven't figured it out yet that the impeachment BS has no facts or evidence to back it up. This was all showmanship for the Democridiots. Almost every one of the those Democridiots voted for this war. There is evidence dating back to the early 90's in regards to this war. How is it that now that we have a republican in office it becomes a lie. I'll tell you, it's because the democrats want the power back and will destroy this country to get it. They don't care how many die because of their crap, they want the power and that is that.
2006-09-30 08:43:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
They would try. All they would do by doing this is get Cheney into the office. They hate him too. The American people would not stand for an attempted impeachment. They know that liberals have lied about all the supposed lies of Bush.
2006-09-30 08:39:21 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He would surely be investigated and if he was found to be doing anything unlawfully then yes. The rubber stamp repuglicans will not ever do that even though some of them don't like the way he does business.
2006-09-30 08:54:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats need to realize that as the baby boomers get older and get more life experiences they are becoming more and more Conservative as they the Democrats become more desperate as the queers lead them more left.
2006-09-30 08:54:21 · answer #9 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Possibly, because Republicans have a stronger tendency to protect evil liars and crooks
2006-09-30 08:48:39 · answer #10 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋