Which one was better in your opinion. Dawn of the Dead (2004) or the origional Dawn Of the Dead (1978)? I liked them both but i kinda like the origional one more. What about you?
Please go here if you haven't already thanx! http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhUCF_1MrlI9UPsmtzstmnDsy6IX?qid=20060925161249AAOVt73
2006-09-30 06:55:29 · 15 answers · asked by I Luv Joel Madden!! 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I have seen Shawn of the Dead!! I saw it b4 i ever saw either Dawn of the Dead's.
2006-09-30 07:07:27 · update #1
Have you seen the new 1978 vesion on DVD? It's got some added stuff and it's uncut. The cut version is shown on tv and they cut the part out where they are eating the flesh of dead bodies. (actually it was just some raw meat). Anyway I think the old version is really creepy since it's all in black and white.
2006-09-30 07:45:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I prefer the 2004 version, just cause the zombies could run and that added a sense of urgency.Though its been said before, but 'Shaun of the Dead' is a classic and the writer and director you could tell really loved Romero's films, cause there are several nods to George.
2006-09-30 07:22:15 · answer #2 · answered by Callista77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dawn of the Dead 2004- but even better was Shawn of the Dead-
2006-09-30 06:57:14 · answer #3 · answered by Trip S 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Dawn Of the Dead, The original.
Classics are usualy always better....But its a hard decission.
But i loved the new one.. because of the updated graphics, And special effects./ It Kicked total Ar*se.
Id have to say the new one.:)
2006-09-30 07:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by ♥Perfectly.Flawed♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you like Dawn of the Dead try Sean of the Dead.
2006-09-30 06:57:52 · answer #5 · answered by lothlorien30 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, of course there's nothing like the original version by divine gore master Romero, but I believe that this remake is far very more decent, I mean, there's more gore scenes and more character developing than in the previous one. It's hard for me to decide too they are both great in their own way!
2006-09-30 06:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love both...they're both very different. Obviously the graphics are better in the 2004 one, but I did love the new version...I loved the way it ended.
2006-09-30 06:57:59 · answer #7 · answered by Yvette S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shaun of the useless is a zombie movie spoof, the position as break of day of the useless is the common very previous few survivors attempt to flee the zombie fest.. Sounds to me like Shaun of the useless is what you opt for to observe. i theory it became distinctly good.
2016-11-25 04:10:18 · answer #8 · answered by gyllenband 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i love dawn or the dead and land of the dead but hate sean of the dead
2006-09-30 09:58:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Origional one was awesome cuz well it was origional! lol. it was like so awesome! the 2004 version was like awesome too but it was like kinda sad...♥
2006-09-30 07:29:59 · answer #10 · answered by ♥Tyson Ritter♥ 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋