YOU KNOW THE STORY!! Sampson was this super-strong Jew-dude who was blinded and then chained to the columns of an Ishmaelite temple or whatever and while the Ishmaelites were chowing down a good meal of Ishmaelitist grub, Sampson began pulling on the columns of the porch where they all were and BRINGS THE WHOLE BLOOMING THING DOWN ON ALL OF THEM.
WHAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SAID ACTION abrupts terminates the chowing-down, leaving all participants and their unwilling guest permanently deceased !!!
Doesn't that put Sampson in the same league as a modern-day suicide-bomber, huh? What's the diff? No diff as I see it. The Jew-dude wasted himself in order to waste the Ishmalites.
What's you take on this important issue ???
2006-09-30 06:23:03 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
NOTE FOR CIPNATSI (or whatever)--Hmmm, interesting but then the Israelis have all the Palestinians in the 20th year of house arrest as well as killing their women and children, stealing their land/farms/businesses/towns/olives, so it about amounts to the same thing.
Still no diff as I see it.
2006-09-30 06:48:17 · update #1
not important...
but spoken like an Arms Dealer
2006-09-30 06:32:03 · answer #1 · answered by upf_geelong 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, yes, he committed suicide killing his ennemies, but you are missing a slight detail: they had chained them to the columns. He didn't exactly come on his own from far away in order to do that. Let alone all the other things they had done to him.
2006-09-30 13:33:38 · answer #2 · answered by cpinatsi 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋