who was that again?
2006-09-30 06:21:55 · 3 answers · asked by Shiraz!! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You mean Dan Rather at CBS?
Interesting that the story went to the "fake" documents, instead of the content of those documents, which were corraborated by other sources. Sounds like the Roving one again.
2006-09-30 06:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yep, and I'm sure every liberal will stand behind Rather and those fake documents, just like like they stand behind the fake "evidence" that 9/11 was an inside job. You see, to a liberal there is no such thing as objective truth anyway. To a liberal, as long as "evidence" supports what they believe to be true it doesn't matter that it's faked.
2006-09-30 13:39:39 · answer #2 · answered by Will 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked that Swift Boat attack They busted Rather for using photo copies and not being able to produce the original document.
I also liked how they pointed out that the title header was added later using Times Roman which did not exist in the 60's.
I proves that no matter how long you are in the news business that the Swift Boats for Jesus can find you and gun you down.
Chalk up another victory for the Bonesmen
2006-09-30 13:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by Skull&Bones 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋