It was Bohr, but Rutherford's gold foil experiment set the groundwork for the orbital theory.
2006-09-30 05:29:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rutherford's idea was the planetary model of the atom.
Bohr added the idea of an orbital, (where the electron could orbit the nucleus at specific distances), where they did not decay by emitting energy as classical physics dictates. He also worked out the energy differences for these orbitals in the Hydrogen atom.
2006-09-30 12:51:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by christopher N 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Rutherford told that electrons are stationary and he never mentioned anything about orbits, which didn't explain the stability of atoms. It was Bohr's idea of the orbits and the revolution concept of electrons and it explained stability of atoms which was a great deal of perfectness
2006-09-30 12:30:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
here's a bit of trivia: Bhor was Rutherford's student! Really...
Rutherford was the one came up with the theory that the electrons revolve around the orbits.. however... according to Maxwell ( a scientist) any charged particle when accelerated radiates energy.. (which is true) however... considering this.. then the electrons would've continuously lost energy and would've taken to a spiral path and would've crashed into the nucleus which does not happen..
So to clear your Question... Bhor was the one to say that electrons revolve around the orbit and Bhor was the one to specify that the electrons revolve around only SPECIFIC orbits.
2006-10-01 11:49:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ajay I 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
on the basis of rutherford's theory bohr made the base that electrons revolved in circular orbits
2006-10-01 02:56:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ekta K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rutherford experiment (deflection of alfa particles) suggested that all the positive mass of the atoms was confined in a small space.
Bohr suggested the "orbits" model and used it to calculate the radius of the electron orbit in hydrogen.
2006-09-30 12:53:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dr. J. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it was Bohr's idea Rutherford stated that in order to neutralize positively charged particles (protons) in nucleus there must be negatively charged particles(electrons) uniformly distributed around centre..
2006-10-02 01:18:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by seju 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO,
Rutherfod suggest that electrons balance the positive charge on nucleus.
He added that electrons are revolving around the nucleus at high speed.
But he didn't mention that it is on circular path.
2006-10-02 06:58:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by malukollam20 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes he did and it rutherford is bohr as well
2006-09-30 20:00:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
NO not at all.
i ill tell u
1.) dalton atomic model:
he proposed that all matter is made up of extremly small partilces called ATOM. atom cannot be created nor can be destroyed or can be converted to that of other atom.
2.)J.J thomson:
he proposed that there are negatively charged particles uniformly distributed in it.
3.)rutherford :
he proposed that there is heavy and +ve charge in centre.this dense region is called nuclues and there are -ve around it. he proved this by alpha scattering experiment. in this experiment he allowed fast moving alpha particles to pass through thin gold foil.
4.)bohr bury scheme:
by the formula 2n^2 he said that -ve are in orbits.
___________________________________________________
_______________%%
_______________%%
______________%%%
_____________%%%%%
____________%%%%%%
_____________%%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%
_____________%%%__%%
_____________%%%__%__%
_____________%%%___%__%
_____________%%%___%___%
_____________%%%___%___%
_______%%____%%%__%____%
______%__%__%%%%%%____%%
______%___%%_____%____%%
_______%____%%%%%____%%
________%___________%%
_________%_________%%
_________%%__take__%%
________%%_________%%%
_______%%___care____%%%
______%%______________%%
_____%%________________%%
_____%%_________________%%
_____%%%________________%%
______%%_______________%%%
_______%%%____________%%%
_________%%%%________%%%
___________%%%%%%%%%
2006-09-30 13:14:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by shack_duke 2
·
1⤊
1⤋