Do you think there is a mining for a wedding for a present time ?

Answer 1

assuming you mean meaning

if you mean the social marriage ceremony, i think it is immoral, because it is just trying to force a person to be something - which cannot be loving

the fundamental definition of love is I AM WHAT I AM - ie, there is nothing in nature that can tell me i should be anything other than what nature made me - ie, nature is the highest authority - who can question nature and say she is wrong? - can any person, who cannot make one atom, give instructions to the whatever that has made 10 to the power 63 atoms? - would anyone be foolish enough to claim to know that a periwinkle should be different from what it is? - therefore equally foolish is the person who says a person should be thus or thus

so society claiming to know how a person should be and forcing a person to be thus or thus is wrong

of course anyone is entitled to say: i think doing this or this would be good for your happiness - for that is loving - but anyone can be wrong, and the final arbiter has to be the person, because a person knows best, even if no one knows what is best

any use of force is slavery

to forceably alter a person is to destroy that person, and it is immoral for a person to allow themselves to be altered, it is immoral for anyone to bow to others' opinions, since others are equals, not superiors

[although some are superior to others, no one can know who is superior, so, for practical purposes, we are equal, and therefore slavery or deference to others is immoral, ie, is selfdestruction, selfhate]

society is such an enormously immoral thing that no one of any pretension to morals would defer to it, or seek moral sanction from it

obedience and diobedience are immoral because they are mindless - they are giving your body to the mind of others - spiritual suicide, selfdestruction

society is either less moral or more moral than the self - if less moral, then it is not to obey - if more moral, how could the less moral self know this? - they couldnt - they would have to be equally moral or more moral in order to know it - so obedience is mindless, mental suicide, abdication from rule of oneself - totally immoral

there would be nothing immoral in going through a wedding ceremony, if there was no contract to behave differently from oneself, to be untrue to oneself, to betray oneself

see my other answers

Answer 2

I think you mean "Have weddings lost their meaning ?" My answer is no. I believe in the sacrament of marriage and I'm sure many people still do. It's making it work that is the hard part and people turn away from their partners rather then building a team. Once that's done it's almost never fixable. So many things were transgressed to reconcile, but it can be done!

Answer 3

This question is not clearly worded.

Either you want to know if people only throw weddings to get gifts, which is true.

Or you want to know if wedding have any meaning any more , which they should but it has more to do with wanting gifts than share a spiritual bond infront of family and friends.

Answer 4

I guess you could hire a mime for a wedding or arrange for a theme wedding around a mine ?

Answer 5

More likely is that you can either walk to school, or carry your lunch.

But seriously, time to go back and study that English again.

Answer 6

There is no meaning to anything unless human agree to put it on ...then it becomes "meaningful" ...still , primarily, there is no meanings exist outside of human's mind.

Answer 7

I think that you need to lay off the sauce.

Answer 8

???