English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is your first loyalty to George W. Bush or to the Consitution of the United States of America? By virtue of events this week in Washington, you can only be on one side or the other - if you disagree, you got some 'splainin' to do, Lucy!

2006-09-30 04:39:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

Nor are you, OkieBoy - the point is clear as day.

2006-09-30 04:43:42 · update #1

Ragajungle - You misconstrue. It's not a choice between Bush and Alito

2006-09-30 09:41:23 · update #2

10 answers

The Constitution. If we surrender liberty for security, in short time we will have neither. This President is an abomination to all the Republic stands for. He does NOT represent the majority of Americans on any plane. He has catered to the vast minority of religious right wingers and has landed us in a mess that will take 20 years to recover from. He has set back American relations with all other nations a good 10 years, is probably the least qualified president we have ever had in office. Where were Americans 2 years ago? Couldn't they see this incompetent for what he is? Very sad state of affairs, all the way around. IT is time to completely clean house this November, and those who think otherwise are living on another planet in a parallel universe of lunacy.

2006-09-30 04:43:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I watched as the congressional republicans shredded our beloved Constitution with the new approved standard set forth to give this “c” average president unprecedented power. George Washington said we will hold ourselves to a higher standard and we will always treat our adversaries with dignity and respect. This president and every president from here on out, will be held to the new “bush standard” so we are now operating on the same level as our enemies. We no longer hold the moral high ground.

2006-09-30 04:59:14 · answer #2 · answered by namvet68 2 · 1 1

The constitution, but the problem is no one is fighting for it any more. They want it to look there way, not the way it was written. When are the real people going to stand up. I am, but nobody seems to care any more.

2006-09-30 05:02:23 · answer #3 · answered by shoot.bang 3 · 1 0

impeach Bush likes to assert that his massive tax cuts that provide thousands of billions of funds to u.s.'s wealthiest individuals are job-creation classes. yet u.s. has bled thousands of thousands of jobs because Bush's tax cuts grew to develop into regulation, so that's time to attempt some thing new. Bush's new tactic? Beg China and Japan to develop the fee of their currencies, which will make American manufacturers extra aggressive. yet Bush has no longer some thing to furnish in go back -- and has performed little to make different international locations vulnerable to furnish him favors. fairly of creating unnecessary pleas to different international locations, possibly Bush could arise with an economic plan that would want to truly create jobs fairly of in simple terms putting extra earnings the wallet of those who favor it least. The White homestead likes to tout President Bush as a "good chief." If there is even a modicum of truth to that, Bush already knows who leaked Valerie Plame's identity as an undercover CIA agent. yet even as requested, he refuses to do some thing to bare the reality, fairly in simple terms claiming, "i favor to understand the reality," and passing the greenback (as conventional) to the Justice branch. even as Joseph Wilson printed that the Bush administration had used fake intelligence to justify the conflict in Iraq, a smear marketing campaign antagonistic to him develop into predictable. even with the indisputable fact that it develop into no longer accessible to foretell that the White homestead might want to teach that Wilson's spouse develop into an undercover CIA agent who worked on guns of mass destruction -- supposedly the reason we went to conflict in the first position -- in simple terms to get again at Wilson.

2016-12-04 01:39:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i disagree because i really disagree with bush, but i am also not a "constitutionalists" -they tend to read the constitutuion from an extremeists perspective-worse than bush.

i am one of the majority of americans that are in the middle.

2006-09-30 04:55:24 · answer #5 · answered by ragajungle 2 · 1 1

Fu*ck Bush. I am an Idependent. I speak freely and go whith what I feel is right for me. No dumb a** is gonna tell me what he thinks is right for me.

2006-09-30 04:43:40 · answer #6 · answered by Brittney 5 · 3 2

constitution. look what Germany happened to Germany when the nation was forced to swear allegiance to Hitler.

2006-09-30 04:42:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3 2

BOTH and the to the safety and well-being of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-30 04:43:43 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 2

i think Donald rumsfeld has the answer.

2006-09-30 05:05:19 · answer #9 · answered by jean 2 · 2 0

A member of MENSA your not!

2006-09-30 04:40:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers