ENDNOTES:
[*] The crimes charged in the indictment were committed in Manhattan, which is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=24646
2006-09-30 03:03:30 · 6 answers · asked by Jean R 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No but, they should be forced to give the leaker up. Thay are endangering all of us with this crap. Typical lib publication though. It's sad to see Americans undermining their own.
I believe the American people are smarter than the libs think they are.
2006-09-30 03:07:40 · answer #1 · answered by thomasnotdoubting2 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it is time to keep the head low and not to make any waves other wise SH!T WILL HIT THE FAN.The greatest crime commited in the history of UNITED STATES was also in Manhattan
2006-09-30 13:22:13 · answer #2 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No chance in hell! All the NY Times did was to expose the secrets of the Bush administration's covert activities! I commend the paper for spilling the beans! Who knows? I bet the NY Times is going to probe deep inside Bush's criminal mind! Let's see where this one goes next! Heh heh!
2006-09-30 11:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Then the Bush administration should be indicted for the leaks they have created.
2006-09-30 10:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by Gettin_by 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
the us media have some protections. the people leaking could be in trouble. but they must have leaked for a darn good reason. they could loose pensions, jobs you name. they mut have felt the need for the americans citizens to know. the bush adm is going backwards.
2006-09-30 10:11:05 · answer #5 · answered by CCC 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
hell no...Bush would love to silence his critics
2006-09-30 10:06:40 · answer #6 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋