People who but into this conflated , ficticious and dumbed down
term are being led around by the nose by the Bush Administration.
There is no truth to this label. It reminds me of anti semitic rhetoric from Germany in the 1930s. Its a perjorative, rascist, and false label. You " true believers " who think otherwise are being led like sheep. You may want to visit the local library and check out some books once in a while.
2006-09-30
02:50:06
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Hand: I don't believe you know what fascism is - and when is it " treason " to support the Constitution? Thomas Jeffrerson, Theodore Rosevelt and G Washington would find your opinions insuportable.
2006-09-30
03:02:27 ·
update #1
Jesi: Neocon Republicans created this term. Its used as a shibboleth, a false fear or myth to scare people into supporting the president and his war aims....over the Constitutional protection of US citizens.
You are still conflating and I would argue there is a huge difference between groups like Fatah, Hamas, Al Queda, or Hezbollah. I wonder if you'd know the difference between them.
The GOP created a boogey man to scare American voters and draws false analogies to WWII. Stop being a sheeple.
2006-09-30
03:28:17 ·
update #2
They simply believe it because the President says it is so. These are people who want simple answers to complex problems. Conflating is just fine, it reduces the number of issues too!
2006-09-30 02:55:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The very last time I regarded eu international places were white. Spaniards and different southern Europeans are also classed as white. the precedence that many human beings sense about modern mass immigration is that there is no decision in any respect. All are welcome be they criminals, terrorists or inspite of. further to that the so said as 'host us of a' has been suppressed to the volume that it really is now 'racist' to reveal alarm even although our subculture, our historic previous and our faith is lower than attack. as far as i'm worried immigrants are welcome in the experience that they are first rate, prepared to paintings and combine. Too many do no longer. The champagne socialists who're so professional the coverage of mass immigration are untouched through the a lot less alluring area. we've a huge Muslim inhabitants in our city now and maximum of them are nice as are the Afro Caribbeans who, often, are somewhat large. both one in each of those communities have their criminal aspects (as do the the 'whites', I hasten to operate). The sight of Romanian moms bodily abusing their toddlers at bus stops is too a lot to take yet we daren't say anthing. it really is a longtime shown reality that the crime cost has risen exceedingly because the inflow of foreigners global. you only ought to study the interior sight paper's regulation Courts web page to maintain in mind that. And the significant element that politicians do not get that it really is the usual regulation abiding immigrant communities who're even extra anxious about it than we are. i'm no longer a BNP supporter yet even i'm getting depressed when I walk down our intense St and do not hear a note of English spoken. i do not stay in a city, I stay in what changed into once a sleepy marketplace city.
2016-11-25 03:53:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The term was coined out of political correctness. Since Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah and Hamas are all groups who are engaging in terror, and we are ar war with terror, there had to be a term to appease the hypersensitive who kept pointing out "not all Muslims are terrorists."
Since Bush repeated said, we are at war with terror, not Islam and the PC group continued to say it was not fair to the peaceful Muslims, the term Islamofascist was born to accentuate the difference between Muslims and fanatics who cower behind Islam.
So yes there is such a thing as an Islamofascist, it was born out of the desire that the left has of being PC at all times. It'll make the list of words added to the dictionary soon enough.
2006-09-30 03:06:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Maybe you should read some books. The Jews were the ones being slaughtered then. Islamofascists are trying to exterminate Christians and Jews today. Facts are tough things aren't they.
You will be reading the definition of Islamofascist in the dictionary some day.
Get it together man. Realize who the real enemy is. It's not Bush.
2006-09-30 03:00:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by babe 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
The point the President was trying to make about fascism is that at its core it is intolerant and destructive towards other beliefs. Fascism is the opposite of freedom and that is precisely what we're up against in Islamic fascism.
While youre in your beloved library, look up the term "treason" as it applies to liberals trying to defeat all the presidents efforts to keep this country safe in the War on Terror. It is unprecedented how the liberal media has been a willing accomplice in publishing security leaks compromising our national security putting every future American at risk of more terror attacks. Lets deal with terrorism now while we can liberals!
2006-09-30 02:57:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
You aren't the target audience of the people using the term. They're trying to keep the sheeple stupid, scared and divided, and for that purpose it works well enough.
2006-09-30 02:52:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by kirun 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't see the point of arguing over a title. We know how dangerous members of this evil cult are, and I don't think it matters what you call them.
2006-09-30 02:53:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
When 10,000,000 Americans listen to "Viagra Boy" than there is no help for "Stupid"
2006-09-30 02:53:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Taco 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its a word the common dumb ***.s can use in their retarded political conversations
2006-09-30 02:51:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by dstr 6
·
3⤊
5⤋
That 's just plain foolishness.
2006-09-30 02:51:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by thomasnotdoubting2 3
·
3⤊
4⤋