2006-09-30 02:14:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
While I have had no experience with an uncircumcised lover, I have always been told that there is a higher chance of STDs being carried by someone who is uncircumcised.
2006-09-30 02:22:59 · answer #1 · answered by physandchemteach 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like any surgical procedure, circumcision has some risks. However, the rate of problems after circumcision is low. Bleeding and infection in the circumcised area are the most common problems. Sometimes the skin of the newly exposed glans becomes irritated by the pressure of diapers and ammonia in the urine. The irritation is usually treated with petroleum ointment (Vaseline) put directly on the area. This problem will usually lessen after a few days. Yeast infections can spread to the woman if the guy has it.
2006-09-30 02:18:35 · answer #2 · answered by bor_rabnud 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Not at all. What would be the problem?? The people on this earth that has ever lived and made it a big deal were the old Hebrews of the biblical days. And even then there was nothing sexual about the reason. Other then that no one ever made it a big deal. Being circumcised has nothing to do with how you pleasure a woman, and has nothing to do with the skills you possess. A piece of skin has nothing to do with you be able to have sex!!!!!!!
2006-09-30 02:23:06 · answer #3 · answered by a1b2c3d4bj 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Circumcised men have less feeling. Circumcision became a cosmetic thing. It was for religion. Uncircumcised men get all the senses while circumcised men miss quite a bit.
2006-09-30 02:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Know 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No from what I have been told men who are circumcised lose 25% of their sexual feeling...
2006-09-30 02:49:09 · answer #5 · answered by Mechelle 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, ive been with both.. although its a bit of a shock to see a man that hasnt been circumcised before ..i personally believe it feels better then a man that has been .. think theres more sensation.
2006-09-30 02:24:21 · answer #6 · answered by brwneyedgrl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Put it this way, they were born with foreskin... They're completely fine! There is absolutly no difference with sex for the woman. You can't tell. The best man I've ever had in bed is all natural :)
2006-09-30 02:24:49 · answer #7 · answered by Snoopy 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was married to an uncircumcised man for about 21 years... he was sex-crazed (never learned how to control himself).
It can make a BIG difference... the foreskin teases them... & they're constantly stimulated because of it.
2006-09-30 02:34:42 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It makes no difference whatever
2006-09-30 02:32:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, uncircumsised men feel better pleasure & so does the girl.
2006-09-30 02:20:36 · answer #10 · answered by Mosez 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋