you are 100 % correct
2006-09-30 01:20:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
final time I checked the rustic regulation isn't the international regulation, if such as you reported the age is 13 in spain and he became 14 then not something is incorrect. heavily EDIT: Julie M it makes me absolutly ill to ensure the rubbish which you're writting. "guy is a sicko, gets his rocks off on violating infants, and clearly belongs in a psychological corporation/reformatory" the guy in question is a woman not a guy, study to ensure you fool, whilst ever some thing against a infant happens you on the instant assume that it became a male who commited a criminal offense??? examine THE question it says a women human beings flew in the process to Spain to have intercourse with a 14 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old boy. not a guy. end BLAMING men FOR each and every little thing YOU strategies lifeless FEMINIST.
2016-10-18 06:06:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be nice but here is where freedom comes in. They can choose for themselves when and where to help...and as much as I'd love to see the poor and sick in the USA taken care of first?
Thank God for our freedom to choose!
2006-09-30 01:24:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joey Bagadonuts 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You chose to single out people who are at least doing something for other humans. When a vast majority of wealthy americans do absolutely nothing.
2006-09-30 01:31:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by phoephus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
borders and nations are man-made constructs, as is hunger. it is unnecessary for anyone to go without the necessities; it is human beings who create the conditions under which we live.As to deciding who should be helped; you should help whomever you perceive needs your help. When you say to yourself 'someone should do something' ask yourself what you are doing.
I understand your frustration, it is difficult to understand why people don't do something to change conditions in your country. What are you doing?
2006-09-30 01:31:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by soobee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you 100%. I have thought this for years. And its not just celebrities its everyone in general. They sponser kids from Africa when we have so many in need right here!
2006-09-30 01:27:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the 'charity begins at home' respect, you are right.
it also bugs me that they seem to be doing it to improve their own public image, rather than genuinly wanting to help.
2006-09-30 01:22:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tish P 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
definely...
i don understand y they did not USA first
2006-09-30 01:21:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I've been saying this for years !
2006-09-30 01:59:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't you have public aids at all in the US for these people?
2006-09-30 01:25:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by fuschiapetitspois 4
·
0⤊
0⤋