Yes, it was the time of invention. Invention that favored mass production and thus gave birth to industries like fabric.
2006-09-30 00:52:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by The young Merlin 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes there was, and it didn't start around 1850 as people tend to think. It started around 1798, with the invention of the Jaquard Loom, which was patented in either 1801 or 1802; the first machine to make mass-production of cloth a possibility. This was the one invention which spawned the industrial landscape of 19th century England.
In the space of just 50 years, England changed from being an agricultural society to an industrial society; mass migration to the cities being the result.
In every sense of the word, the industrialisation of Britain was, indeed a complete revolution which affected the lives of everyone, without exception.
2006-09-30 13:48:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by musonic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Industrial Revolution from 1865 to 1900 was a time the US put back together a nation torn apart by war. Machines took the place of hand craftsman and changed how Americans worked and where they would work. The economy was changed from rural into an urban industrial manufacturers and factory workers.
In 1890 the value of factory goods exceeded the value of agricultural products for the first time in history. By 1900 the value of manufactured goods was worth 2 times the value of agricultural goods.
There were new products being made such as the telephone, the light bulb and Singer's Sewing Machine.
From the year 1870 to 1890 nearly 4 1/2 million Americans moved from farm to factory. During 1860 and 1900, 14 million legal immigrants came to America to escape poverty, religious or racial persecution, military service or lack of opportunities in their homelands. Shipping and Railroad Lines advertised cheap land and good employment in a land that had millions of acres of uninhabited, wild land for the settlers and factories who need workers.
Known as the "old immigrants" people from Ireland, England, Germany and the Scandinavian countries begin to arrive from the 1840s to the 1870s. Out of northern and western Europe arrived the fair-skinned Anglo-Saxons. Beginning in the 1880s the "new immigrants" arrived from southern and eastern Europe. This wave of people were Polish Jews, Italians, Slovaks, Greeks, Czechs and others.
Tho there was the Industrial Revolution the nation suffered 2 major economic depressions in 1873-79 and 1893-97. Government policies were largely responsible for the depressions.
Railroads led the way in the industrializing of the US and the first of "big businesses". Others include the Steel and Oil industry.
2006-09-30 01:03:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by MoonWoman 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
To add to previous answers, I think the technology, while obviously important, was not the key determining factor of the existence of an Industrial Revolution. The methods of production themselves weren't the reall issue. Thekey aspect was the growth of rates of output in all areas of trade and production. This has been referred to as the 'take-off into sustained economic growth'. By whatever means, technological or otherwise, the amount of goods being produced (textiles, food, metals, coal, shipping, etc) began to increase, and this increase was supported by increases in population and in the money supply. More population meant larger markets; greater and faster money supply meant more investment; and more investment meant that the cycle could begin again at a higher level.
The technology involved was a primary means of increasing rates of production, and the cumulative effects of technological advance, first in Britain and then in other countries, meant that these increases could be sustained over the course of decades. However, it should also be remembered that another key factor in the Industrial Revolution was the steady rise in population almost everywhere from around 1690 onwards. This was a factor of improving public health, lowered infant mortality rates, the 'professionalisation' and limiting in scope of warfare in the 18th Century, and various other factors.
The technology was important, but other factors were involved, and the whole process of Industrial Revolution, occurring in different countries at different times, spanned the period from say 1700 to 1900, and probably beyond even those loose parameters.
2006-10-01 21:37:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by JimHist 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Newcomen atmospheric steam engine was first used to drain coal mines in the early 18th century. In the middle 18th century improved spinning and weaving machines powered by water wheels resulted in what had been cottage industries being concentrated in large factories,and towns to grow up around these factories. The canals, then after the 1820's the railways enabled the goods and raw materials to be moved around. The iron and steel production needed to build all these machines was revolutionised by the introduction of coke instead of charcoal to smelt the iron ore. Improvements to the steam engine in the late 18th century made it useable for driving factory machinery, railways and ships.
Without the industrial revolution we would still be peasant farmers prone to periodic famines because our food could not be imported or produced in sufficient quantity without machinery. No cars, no television or computers. Now that employment legislation has caused manufacturing industry to move to China we forget what it was once like here.
So the quick answer is there was an industrial revolution.If you want dates say 1740 to 1840.
2006-09-30 23:47:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by David P 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Indeed,the Industrial Revolution was one of the most key events that ever happened to humanity.The structure of the world today is indirectly linked to that Revolution.The first Industrial Revolution happened in England,which introduced the concept of "cheap and mass manufacturing" to the world.This kind of process required a lot of raw materials,thus launching Britain's search for places rich in natural resources such and India and other African countries.England began "colonising" these nations for their resources,launching an era of Empire's,where many European nations expanded into Asia,Africa and other countries.The so called "Third World",is the successor to these Empires,which left these new nations exploited and their populations poor.The social and political make-up of today,thus is in some way...related to the Industrial Revolution.
2006-09-30 03:52:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rahul B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on what you call a revolution - usually it is a radical change in a short period of time, but the 'industrial revolution' could be seen as not having been a revolution as it did happen over quite a long period of time, but it was also quite a radical change as Britain went from being very agricultural to a strongly industrial country within a century.
2006-09-30 00:27:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The era conventional simply by fact the commercial Revolution replace right into a era wherein easy differences handed off in agriculture, cloth and metallic manufacture, transportation, financial rules and the social shape in England. this era is accurately categorized ?revolution,? for it thoroughly destroyed the previous way of doing issues; however the term is concurrently beside the point, for it connotes abrupt replace. The differences that handed off in this era (1760-1850), in certainty, handed off progressively. The 3 hundred and sixty 5 days 1760 is frequently universal simply by fact the ?eve? of the commercial Revolution. certainly, this eve began greater desirable than 2 centuries until now this date. The previous due 18th century and the early l9th century further to fruition the recommendations and discoveries of people who had long handed on, which includes, Galileo, Viscount St. Albans, Descartes and others. Advances in agricultural innovations and practices resulted in an greater grant of nutrition and uncooked components, differences in commercial enterprise and new technologies resulted in greater production, performance and earnings, and the upward thrust in commerce, distant places and enjoyed ones, have been all situations which promoted the introduction of the commercial Revolution. lots of those situations have been so heavily interrelated that greater pastime in one spurred a upward thrust in pastime in yet another. further, this interdependence of situations creates a concern whilst one tries to delineate them for the point of learn interior the lecture room. subsequently, that's crucial that the reader be attentive to this whilst analyzing right here cloth. The narrative portion of this unit is meant for the instructor?s use as a instruction manual to coaching approximately this concern. It would not purport to contain all it extremely is mandatory to show with regard to the commercial Revolution. It does grant a foundation for coaching with regard to the situation, leaving room for the instructor to pass as his/her variety of training helps. One way of capitalizing on any shortcomings in this cloth is to layout individual or small team pupil activities which will develop their learn skills (reference components, library use, learn comments, and so on.), on an identical time as on the
2016-12-12 17:49:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by dricketts 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, yes. All the machines stormed the Bastille, then they invented the guillotine and cut a bunch of heads off people. Then they had lunch.
2006-09-30 00:40:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by stevewbcanada 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not in some of the places I've seen....
2006-10-03 23:28:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by bubbacornflakes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋