In the proof you wind up having to divide by zero, making the proof undefined and therefore invalid.
sorry, but 2 does not equal 3.
2006-09-29 22:28:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lonnie P 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
2+1=3
2006-09-30 06:02:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Miss LaStrange 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
How to prove that 2 = 3 ?
This needs no proof.
It is so obvious.
2006-09-30 09:31:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by curious 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If 2 and 3 are whole numbers then you cannot prove it... you may use algebraic manipulations as usually cited but one usually misses to see the last but one step where you divide by zero and therefor equate both sides to infinity.
If 2 and 3 are symbols, then of course you would have to provide more information...:-) !
2006-09-30 18:07:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by gschatwal 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
-6 = -6
9-15 = 4-10
adding 25/4 to both sides
9-15+ (25/4) = 4-10+(25/4)
Changing the order
9+25/4-15 = 4+25/4-10
(this is just like a square plus b square minus two ab = a-b whole square.)
Here a = 3,2 b=5/2
so it can be expressed as follows
(3-5/2)(3-5/2) = (2-5/2)(2-5/2)
taking positive square root on both sides:
3 - 5/2 = 2 - 5/2
3 = 2
Count Dracula
2006-09-30 05:36:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by The False Prophet 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
sadly, the closest you can get is proving that 10 = 3:
in base 3, the first three numbers are 1, 2, 10.
The third number = 10
in base 10, the first three numbers are 1, 2, 3.
The third number = 3
The third number = 10 and 3
therefore 10 = 3
hope this helps... probably doesn't.
2006-09-30 05:35:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
In a circle, 180 degrees = -180 degrees; 360 degrees = 0 degrees.
So...travel completely around the earth, and you end up at your point of origin.
2 orbits equal 3 orbits.
When measuring units of work, one evaluates in terms of DISPLACEMENT, or change in position, If Pt initial equals Pt final, WORK = 0.
Thus, a true circumnavigation always equals zero, be it once, two times, or three times.
2006-09-30 09:42:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by warmspirited 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2= a number
3= a number
then 2=3= a number
then 2=3
2006-09-30 05:38:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by sanju b 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
it is easy
u know,
0=0
or. 2-2=3-3
or, 2(1-1)=3(1-1)
or. 2=3
2006-09-30 06:06:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by ashipriya 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
simple prove 3=2 then your problr sloved
2006-09-30 05:55:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by kattamudi N V S S 1
·
0⤊
1⤋