Answer correctly, or get ready to loose points.
2006-09-29 20:33:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
There are 16 cameras viewing the players and not even one camera came close on spotting a wrong done.
Then how can one even think that they tampered the ball.
even I dont think so.
DARELL HAIR HAS BEEN WAY TOOOOO PARTIAL TOWARDS THE ASIANS
PREVIOUSLY-SRILNKANSNOW PAKISTANIS WHO NEXT...............
2006-09-29 21:12:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I believe that they are innocent, because even the Sky Sports cameras didn't find any of their players tampering the ball. This definitely proves them as innocent and i think it's a decision that Hair made hastily without any knowledge...whereas he's the person against whom action should be taken...but seems like the ICC are blind-folded or they are being ignorant!!
2006-09-30 07:37:44 · answer #2 · answered by Treza 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there is no reason doubting Pakistan team on ball tampering. The ball had been examined by many experts including member of the ICC Jury and have finally given their verdict. Please note that condition of the ball, expert opinion of the witnesses and probably the match footings all have helped come to the conclusion that "Pakistan team is not guilty" of ball tampering in Oval Test Match.
More unfortunate is that the decision made by Darrel Hair in the ball tampering issue has been dealt by ICC the same way as done in case of wrong LBW decision by Umpire. I believe Mr. Hair should be asked to clarify his position in this case.
I hope this shall bring an end to the "Ball Tampering Stories we all been listening to and reading in newspapers.:-)
2006-09-30 03:50:55 · answer #3 · answered by faisal_waheed 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes they have a history of doing so and for that matter that there were 16 cameras in the ground this dosent affect to experts i.e pakistani bowlers
2006-10-01 00:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by timma21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The adjudicator says that there is no evidence of ball tampering. Since the verdict has been given after enquiry, we should take it.
2006-09-30 09:07:24 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest if they tampered with the ball Inzamam would have been charged.
2006-09-30 06:31:19 · answer #6 · answered by Elliot The Runescape Master 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Inzy got away with 4 match ban, so he does not want to contest it. ICC, as always, took a path that is least risky. All the best to Pak for their future endevours.
2006-09-30 06:37:56 · answer #7 · answered by slender 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i m with KSA( the ans # 5) no cameras have spotted the ball being tampered......... umpire darell hair would have been tempered
2006-09-30 11:06:39 · answer #8 · answered by FIGHTER 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are Darell Hair than Yes. If you have common sense than No - coz they were winning the match.
2006-09-30 09:07:45 · answer #9 · answered by 007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ball is not tampered then why the hell issue
therefore they did
i know they did in past, present and even they will do in future
every one are asking the evidence, i think icc have the evidence in hands and they wont give it to media bcz to avoid *********
2006-09-30 05:07:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋