I totally agree with you.
2006-09-29 16:08:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sugar 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Word on the street: There is said to be a long 25 year history of powerful Republican politicians abusing young children. Investigative reporters were writing that children started started disappearing years ago and then appearing on a pedophile circuit that goes to Butte County California and the kids were abused across multiple state lines in warehouses and lofts and imprisoned until they aged out.
Instead of arresting the Republicans, they secretly take pictures of them with the kids and then forced them to chair Congressional and Senate committees to enact unconstitutional laws that the American people don't want.
When the powers need a nasty story, they reveal one of the these. That's why this noble country has collapsed. These guys should step down be prosecuted, quietly go away and allow the moral and ethical to take over and straighten things out. But of course, that won't happen. Too many brainwashed idiots support them
2006-09-29 16:42:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Reba K 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
here is a few thing. i detect it thrilling that the Republican Congress sidestepped an study sought via the Democrats and the full component gets despatched to the ethics committee (the place not all mild reaches) with a view to guard Foley from public grilling in Congress. i understand Cinton did incorrect with Lewinsky, yet she became an person and became a minimum of woman (the quantity of time any funds spent on that became ridiculous...and actual crude partisan politics). If Foley has performed this act it is going to possibly be penitentiary time for a monster, and "Thank God!" if he became only "trolling" and did not molest the boy and it became caught in time...I call this one an in depth call...the guy desires to pay the piper. yet what disturbs me maximum is that the Republican management (in accordance to the item) would have tried to conceal this for a 300 and sixty 5 days. Is the guy above me here a pedophile? i don't think of the Democrats are as probable to violate the form because of the fact the republicans...only look at this final week in the homestead. The Republicans will get rid of rights real and left and ignoramuses won't whinge..yet whilst a regulation breaker endangers a infant they call foul whilst a Democrat needs justice.
2016-10-18 05:46:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is the difference if it is a "Republican" or "Democrat". He is a politician, a government worker and they are supposed to be so "Perfect". They are supposed to "protect" us. They are so "high and mighty" they never make a mistake. This goes for priests, too.
I believe it is about the third time this year, maybe fourth that a government worker got suspended or fired for misconduct.
The ironic part about "Foley" is, he actually talked on being against child predators.
There was a detective here in CA, that was a child counciler who got caught molesting girls. That is so sick. That is why I believe in "God". There are so many people that deceive other poeple, I know, there is someone that knows what they are doing.
2006-09-29 16:15:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by pixles 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the system of power. Just like the Catholic priests. By spending money (replacing humans with green pieces of paper) you create a system where violence goes downhill and people compete for the upper levels of power. In order to 'prove' their power, they commit violent acts against the weakest minds they can find.
It's the heirarchy of competition. You can pass all the laws you want, but they only work against those who are already compliant. The most competitive people don't care about the laws anyway, since they believe they have 'earned' some kind of exemption from society's rules.
If you want change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is your vote and the machines don't count.
2006-09-29 16:12:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by auntiegrav 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
It always amazes me that the very people that shun homosexuality between grown consenting adults are homosexually soliciting and molesting children. The republican party had a fit when Clinto was getting his rox off, but on an issue like this they "turn the other cheek." It disgusts me, BUT it also means that there is one more seat open that a democrat will be taking!
2006-09-29 16:15:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by ragajungle 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Children make republicans feel more powerful. Just look at that evil devil worshipper up in North or South Dakota that is running what she calls "Jesus Camp." She has brainwashed these little children into worshipping a cardboard cut out of the shrub. I'm sure she has an orgasm everytime she sees one of these little children, and yes, she, Pat Robertson, and Jerry Falwell should be put away for life without parole.
2006-09-29 16:13:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The unsurprising aspect of this story is the typical Republican hypocrisy involved....
Foley accused the Supreme Court of siding with pedophiles. He sponsored legislation to protect kids from internet predators. He stood on his pedastal and lectured about how the GOP was protecting our children, while the Democrats were basically the party of NAMBLA. I can only hope the rest of the country is as sick of these sanctimonious Republicans as I am....
2006-09-29 16:15:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by lamoviemaven 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't have any need to do anything to children. I'm not a Republican or a priest.
As for child molesters, screw prison, just shoot them all.
2006-09-29 17:12:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by lordsojourno 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
why are democrats upset, you set the precedent
1. demanding a lowering of the age of consent to 12
2. Barny frank running a gay brothel out his apt
3. Bill Clinton - nothing else has to be said here
2006-09-29 16:19:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shiraz!! 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe they should join the left wing so they could get into NAMBLA or the ACLU who defends people like this and finds loopholes to help them get away with it
BTW, not all preists are republicans. There are a lot of democrat preists
2006-09-29 16:11:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by songndance1999 4
·
2⤊
2⤋