English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if he did ,things couldn't be any worse

2006-09-29 15:51:17 · 15 answers · asked by magpie 6 in Politics & Government Government

baseballa: I just mean why go on and on about the 10 people in Iraq that are glad we're there, cmon already

2006-09-29 16:00:34 · update #1

swimchick: While I appreciate your input, if I had his $$$ and education, oh yes I would

2006-09-29 16:02:22 · update #2

15 answers

Seriously I hate the lot of them, but I really think(May the powers that be forgive me), I really think Georgie is more to be pitied than hated. He is the classic example of a stooge. He has not had a thought of his own since Yale or Harvard. He is burnt out. He does and says what he is told. If a question comes from left field, he looks like a deer caught in the head lights. You may not agree with the Pres. of Iran, but it's obvious why Georgie would not debate him. Because what georgie does is right & why should he explain himself. BULLCRAP, he couldn't. He answers to Cheney, Daddy Bush & the neo cons. An other major player in this action is the WTO.

2006-09-29 16:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Pride and shortsightedness.

To Baseballa... Dissent is what America is all about. The current administration wants to do away with it so they can do what they want. When Clinton was in office you people were saying the same things, it never changes. This country has always been run by thirds, one Conservative, one Liberal, One on the fence. The Liberals and Conservatives know where they stand. The fence sitters are the deciding factor. Bush's ratings will never go below one third. Look at Newt Gingrich back in the 90's he had two thirds until the money scandal, then he dropped to one third. There are many examples of this through our history.

2006-09-29 23:05:23 · answer #2 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 3 0

Give me a break. Bush has faced one of the toughest presidentcies in American history. With the Middle East in extreme tension, high foreign hostility toward America, unstable countries going nuclear, to name a few. Oh, and the recent "fad" to hate and criticize everything the government does. Bush is doing as good a job as anyone could given the situation. How do you know that Gore would have handled 9/11 and terrorism differently, maybe he would have done a horrible job facing it? Do you think that YOU could have done better? It's not like Bush had a crystal ball going into Iraq, how was he suppose to know Saddam was bluffing. Saddam gassed (poison gas is a "WMD")Kurds in his own country, then threatened the U.S. with it. Bush was being pre-emptive in invading Iraq. If Saddam did actually have WMD's and Bush did not invade he would get criticized for NOT invading Iraq. I love and cherish the Constitution and Bill of Rights (especially the First and Second Amendments) but I think it is sad that it has become "cool" to hate the government because of something someone read off "Myspace" or "YouTube".

2006-09-30 03:47:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Why don't you just admit that your party are a bunch of sore losers? Bush may not be perfect and of course he has made some mistakes, but I sure as heck am glad he was president on 9/11 instead of Al Gore. Can you imagine what life would be like now if it had been Al Gore? What would he have done? More importantly what would he have NOT done. If he made decisions on terrorism issues as his old boss did, we would all be speaking arabic now. Bush is in unchartered territory. He is the first president in our history that has had to deal with this type of threat. Regardless of what the democratic hacks want people to believe, I believe he is doing what he believes is the best for the security of our nation!

2006-09-29 23:12:08 · answer #4 · answered by Cinner 7 · 0 4

He knows what he's doing... its just that he doesn't admit what he's doing and hides behind a fake "dumb boy" act to get away with it. He Graduated from Yale... think about it.

As for the douche who says that "Democrats" hate Bush or whatever... this guy doesn't sound very political to me. I think he's just an average person who thinks Bush is retarded. You don't have to be a Democrat to think that.

You might even be a Republican like me who's angry that he didn't even try to live up to the promises he made and has failed miserably leaving all Conservatives scarred by his misuse of office.

Enough is Enough! I want my Tax money back!

2006-09-29 23:05:43 · answer #5 · answered by Big C 5 · 0 2

He can't do that at the current time. He's the most powerful Republican in office and elections are about to come up. Republicans are fearing they will lose their lead to the Democrats as it is. To have Dubya admit that he's a bumbling idiot at this time would be committing political suicide for the GOP

2006-09-29 22:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by PinkBrain 4 · 5 1

Bush won't admit it because making that admission would be a sign of intelligence and Bush is as dumb as a rock.

2006-09-29 23:30:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

He won't. He is doing too many things that don't comply with our governments set standards and laws, though he's the dictator so he can do what he wants.

2006-09-29 23:06:51 · answer #8 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 2 0

You seem to have all the answers.
Instead of whining about what Bush is doing, make a REAL suggestion on how to do it better.
If you're that smart, why don't you run for President?

2006-09-29 23:02:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

He doesn't know how! He could not come up with one mistake he ever made while in office! Mr. Perfect! Ha!

2006-09-29 23:02:39 · answer #10 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers