If the custodial parent moves out of the county who is responsible for the transportation of the child?

Question

We moved to a neighborong county and there is a dispute over the transporting of the child for visits

Answer 1

You should meet in the middle. But usually it's the parent that doesn't have custody that has to make the sacrifice of driving out of his/her way.

Answer 2

If the custodial parent move out of the county, the other party, have to make its mind how to get there to visit or to transport the child.

Answer 3

I know that the state that I live in, the non custodial parent is responsible for the transportaion, but I am only talking if I were to move out of the state, not the country.

I use to battle with my x over everything concerning the children, but we both started to compromise things went alot better. It is still hard.

I guess the only real answer to this is to talk to a family law attorney when the divorce/visitation was ordered.

By the way where I live, I think that if I were to move out of the state he has a right to try and contest it due to visitation, however from what I know it is VERY rarley denied if ever.

Hope things so smoothly for you and the children.

Answer 4

The non-custodial discern would desire to be searching for a shift in custody to become the custodial discern and hence request a pass-away. In California, as quickly as a divorce petition is filed, there is an computerized proceed to exist pass-aways till the courtroom makes a call or the events can come to an contract. In California, the Courts generally grant pass aways if it is the will of the custodial discern. The custodial discern would desire to be shifting for a stronger job; extra desirable faculties; closer to kinfolk, and so on. till you desire to concern the infant to depositions or testimony, (which i would not advise), the pass away will take place. so because it is the place the different subject comes into play. once you are the custodial discern and there's a request for a shift in custody, you may desire to positioned up a combat. The courtroom will look at what's in the final hobbies of the infant. you like a attorney that can assist you you with this conflict.

Answer 5

i understand i have been there, we agreed one drives one way, and the other brings them back. so both of you are sharing the responsibilty. its the best way to settle a dispute equally, with out upsetting the child, you need to stay calm and try not to fight over things in front of the kids, i think this would work for you, or take turns every other time.

Answer 6

Whoever wants to see the child has to come get them. I would say if you want to love your kid, then one parent drives one way and the other parent drives the other way. Why does it have to be a battle? It is so easy to compromise in this situation...50/50. Stop the fighting...and grow the hell up.

Answer 7

well, have one bring and the other return the child...DUH

making this a dispute is using the child as a pawn in YOUR problem ... both of you need to realize this is about the CHILD,

NOT YOU TWO

Answer 8

if there is any love for this child it shouldn't be a problem. both should be jumping to transport the child.

Answer 9

one time u go one way, the next time the other parent. or meet in the middle. if u still cant agree on something youre probably going to end up in court about it. hope this helps :)