Senator Leahy: "What has changed in the last five years that our Government is so inept and our people so terrified that we must do what no bomb or attack could ever do by taking away the very freedoms that define America? Why would we allow the terrorists to win by doing to ourselves what they could never do, and abandon the principles for which so many Americans today and through our history have fought and sacrificed?"
2006-09-29 15:30:59 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Al Qaeda's is a CIA affiliate...and that is the Gods honest truth!
2006-09-29 15:32:13 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Bush's incompetent, ill-conceived policies have certainly made the terrorists stronger. This was confirmed by the NIE in APRIL, and things have gotten dramatically worse since then....So, yes, having Bush in office has been very beneficial to the terrorists.
Republican idiots always ***** that Clinton was to blame for 9/11 because he didn't do anything about the Cole bombing or the embassy attacks in Africa. The sad truth is, no one cared much about those attacks. They barely registered on the public's radar, making it politcally impossible to mount a strong military response....But now that 9/11 has galvinized the country, Bush could easily justify swift responses to terrorist actions. But he does nothing. Terrorists blow up a club in Bali. Bush does nothing. Terrorists are taking control of Indonesia. Bush does nothing. Hezbollah launches missles into Israel. Bush does nothing. Terrorists attack our embassy in Syria, blow up trains in Spain and buses in London. Bush does nothing.
All he does is commit all our resources to the losing effort in Iraq. And Republicans cheer him on, saying he is "tough on terror". Nothing could be further from the truth.
2006-09-29 16:34:27 · answer #2 · answered by lamoviemaven 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry yet you're incorrect in this question and once again you understand this! attempt real question for once James and also you will get extra perfect solutions and real ones. you would possibly want to even been considered as some individual who likes information no longer fables! As to the Muslims being a minority once again you're factually incorrect. There are over a million.5 billion believers of Mohamed or Islam. that signifies that they seem to be a million sixth of the inhabitants of Earth. again easily one of your fake options. next the Republicans might want to like them to flow the mosque to an section which won't be able to be considered from floor 0. no longer some thing about them no longer saying that they mosque could no longer be construct. again easily one of your fake options. As to the recruiting of added terrorist for Al Qaeda they do no longer favor help because there are a variety of of human beings in this faith that would want to like to develop into martyrs for the seventy 2 virgins. they believe that because this united states does no longer keep on with their faith and rigidity on all women individuals in this united states Shira regulation that we could continually be killed. again easily one of your fake options.
2016-12-04 01:21:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the terrorist wish is to die, then the answer is yes. Bush has said dozens of times, he will not sacrifice the national security of the United States. Liberals and the Democrats have their back against the wall with the mid-term election and are clutching at straws to hold on.
Name one honest law-abiding US citizen that has had their rights taken away.
2006-09-30 02:50:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is the Democrats who lean towards Al Queda's bidding. Republicans like Bush fight wars against terror. Republicans put the ban on the taliban in Afghanistan. And made an example out of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Democrats like Clinton had the chance to capture bin Laden years before 9-11 but chose not to.
And of course we have to give up some freedoms for safety. But better safe than sorry. I am willing to have luggage checked on trains and airplanes. Time consuming, but saves lives.
2006-09-29 15:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by FrozenCloud 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Senator Leahy. The constitution has been shredded and our freedoms stripped away. The Bush cabal and all the Republican puppets and sheeple have done more harm to this country than terrorists ever could. Quit drinking the kool-aid sheeple before it's too late.
2006-09-29 15:44:35 · answer #6 · answered by jen_hop39 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, the Democrats assist our mortal enemies by opposing the fledgling democracy in Iraq, advocating cut-and-run and quisling appeasement strategies, divulging secret intelligence gathering programs to the enemy, opposing the incarceration of enemy combatants and their prosecution, advocating the gutting of the Patriot Act, allowing illegal immigrants to cross our borders unhindered, publicizing every potential mistake and misstep of our brave soldiers fighting for our freedom overseas, partnering with the lying mainstream media to distort, mis-state and take out of context facts about the War on Terror, ridicule and pillory our current administration over every possible issue they can think of without offering a single positive idea or program to help us solve our problems.
Enough.
2006-09-29 15:41:21 · answer #7 · answered by Answers1 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow a liberal senator bashing Bush? WHAT ARE THE ODDS???????????????????????????
Liberals are in fact the Al-Queda party being that they undermine our war efforts and praise the media for publishing security leaks which render our anti-terror programs useless and spin them to limited political advantage where drooling idiots accept the spoon-fed propaganda. Now be a good little liberal, dont examine the facts and make sure you hate Bush as much as you can, you got an election to lose!
2006-09-29 15:35:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
the funny thing is... whatever Osama says... if it feeds into Bush's hands... he uses it...
I think Osama is giving Bush enough rope to hang himself...
Osama says "Iraq is the battlefield"... Bush eats it up... meanwhile, Osama has the vast majority of the U.S. soldiers tied up in Iraq and absolutely no heat on him...
and meanwhile, after that.. Bush has proposals that even the Supreme Court won't support, because they are such clear violations of our rules and constitution...
the simple fact is... we don't have enough troops in afghanistan to stabilize the country... much less search for terrorists... but we're moving more troops to Iraq.. away from Osama...
when is the last time you heard about a lot of activity in Afghanistan? and in Pakistan very little seems to be going on...
2006-09-29 15:41:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It is the other side (dems) that use Al Queda talking points. It could be the other way around A! are using the Dem. talking points.
2006-09-29 15:39:17 · answer #10 · answered by Jean R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, Al Qaeda pretty much has its way with the Republicans, though it's probably better described as a symbiotic relationship.
2006-09-29 15:33:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋