at least these presidents won the wars the US was involved in, with 99% support of Americans, can Bush get 1/3 of that?
2006-09-29 14:32:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hi Neddie, The entire Bush administration should be held accountable, remember just six short years ago?, It's a very sad state of affairs now. Time to mobilize and prepare for Midterms and the presidential election in 2008, it's time to unite America again.
2006-09-29 14:48:07 · answer #1 · answered by Elusive 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
FDR/Truman liberated the full globe inclusive of Iraq with WWII, for this reason it became reported as a international conflict in the 1st place. Bush has created terrorist and something he has achieved for the time of his Dictatorship has brought about the international to regress diplomatically. Jimmy Carter is sweet now attempting to freshen up lame duck Bush's mess on the instant.
2016-10-18 05:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, you Democratic liberals will go to any length, ago back 61 years and even then get the history wrong.
Both FDR and Truman were involved with just one war...WWII. And if you want to be accurate, something historians like....President Truman was the sitting President and he gets all the credit. Just like you are blaming President Bush ....and as he is the sitting President blame goes with the job. And if you are a big proponent for attacking losing President make sure you put the majority of our inability to win Viet Nam at JFK's door step. He and then Democratic LBJ increased US troop presence there from 15,000 to over 500,000 with 58,000 dead. And Nixon; a Republican finally pulled us out of the war.
If you want to quote history to make political attacks...you need to resreach your history and understand that history can also be used to demonstrate how weak your statement just might be.
2006-09-29 14:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes he should be held accountable, No 1/3 is a bit too high but you know hard core Repulicans will follow no matter what.
He wouldn't make a pimple on FDR or Harry's ***!
BUT there are many other things he should be held accountable for the first is imitating a US President!
2006-09-29 14:52:14 · answer #4 · answered by Old Guy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
While I'm a big fan of blowing WW2 Germany to tiny bits and twice nuking WW2 Japan, I doubt that that party (the ones you point to) any longer would do such things. If I thought they had the balls to protect us in that way, which I don't think the Republicans do, I might be interested.
2006-09-29 15:37:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure...
Hold me accountable too. Ill attack you filthy libs every chance that I get.
By the way... Theres no way either Truman or FDR would ever condone abortion. The DNC has been taken over by tree hugging baby killers.
Dont forget that FDR put a gag prder on the press during WWII. How would that go over with "their" party today????
2006-09-29 14:44:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
How about George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, John Kerry et al being held accountable for destroying the party of FDR and Truman?
2006-09-29 14:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I am not going to be partisan here. But I think objectively the Democratic Pary is in no way the same as the party of FDR and Truman.
Do you think the Republican Party today is the same as the Party of Lincoln?
2006-09-29 14:42:02 · answer #8 · answered by beckychr007 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, Neddie, he is entitled to his opinion like we are, no matter how wrong, or stupid it is. I think Mr. Bush has a lot more to worry about when he impeached and then turned over to the world to try him for his crimes against humainity. It will be hard to give him a fair trial as to many people hate him around the world. But oh well.
2006-09-29 14:38:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Party of FDR & Truman has already surrendered to the enemy.
The country can never trust Democrats again.
And the people wont.
Bush is a hero for pointing out the cowards, and terrorist huggers.
2006-09-29 14:36:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋