His brother, governor of Florida, surely must've had a hand in the millions of votes that were waylaid and not counted and a a other hundred thousands from our enlisted boys and girls, too... and a similar fisco in Ohio...coincidence? Plus all the illiterate yokels that came out of their latrines and woodwork to cast a vote... dumb ignorant fools that don't know better than what their klansmen tell them "good ol' boys" to vote for!
How about because that rodeo clown is a better liar than his daddy (famous for saying "Read my lips, no new taxes," and 7 months later, he raised the taxes on the American public). Oh, yeah, he wanted to sell a port to a foreign country known to support the extremists... the same country he and his daddy has been friendly with since before Dubya learned to tie his shoes while in college! Duh... Da fruit don't fall far from da tree! Yuk, yuk, yuk... ewwwweeeee... Mountain Dewwwww!
2006-09-29 13:43:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Your question is insulting. You are insulting many people. President Bush's election was legal. His presidency is not over. He is dealing with issues that are unique to his presidency. I honestly doubt that you are qualified at this time to declare him the worst president ever. You have a right to your opinion. Wait before you condemn. Consider the way people thought of past presidents compared to the way they are thought of in the present. In most cases there is a difference.
2006-09-29 20:50:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe people are just coming around to that fact. Bush is a talented con-artist,who can make you see red when it really is white. Bush is a great deciever. Also the swift boaters and their lies from the last election plus Bush"s talent for keeping the American people scared to death every minute of the day helped win the last election.
2006-09-29 20:49:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by firewomen 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The politics of fear.. They successfully portrayed Carry as a flip flopper, and use that to suggest that he wouldn't be tough on terror and would be lax on security ect ect.. With the fear that Americans are under of another 911.They elected someone who in at least appearance, looked like he was doing something .
However time has told the truth .WMD wasn't found in Iraq (no terror) not before the war anyway.. Bin Ladden is still on the loose (no change).Iran is a likely a future enemy as well as Syria and then likely every other Muslim country because it will be viewed as another crusade against Muslims.. A crusade because of the countless numbers of civilians being killed who are non combatants
Is a freaking quagmire disguised as a war of terror
2006-09-29 20:50:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shawn S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
His first election was by a vote of 5 -4 (Supreme Court.)
His reelection was by a minority of the vote. The only time a sitting President has not won reelection with more than 50% of the popular vote. This happened due to votes going to outside political parties (Green, Reform, Libertarian etc.)
2006-09-29 20:43:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by my_iq_135 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Liberals would never admit that the majority of people don't buy into their whiney, lets give people who refuse to work everything that those who do work have to earn...it's just not fair...
They won't admit there are some people you just can't negotiate with.
In case they haven't noticed, the Islamic Extremists started this war.
They gave us a choice, convert to Islam or die.
Bush said, I don't think so, and most people agree with him.
If the Liberals want to negotiate with the terrorists, let them move to the Middle East & do it there...
2006-09-29 20:43:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Are we STILL whining about the 2000 election?
2006-09-29 21:14:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
pues porque tiene que ir cambiando, es como un juego, en España pasa lo mismo con los dos partidos mayoritarios PSOE y PP, cada cuatro años rigen unos, por los errores cometidos durante el mandato, la gente no tenemos memória... y cuando se vuelven a equivocar ganan los otros, y asÃ! es un cÃrculo vicioso!
saludos y besos!
2006-09-30 06:51:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only the history books will tell if he was worst or not.
It's too soon to know...ie: hindsight is better than foresight.
2006-09-29 20:39:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by mia2kl2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No entendi, pero deja te digo algo respecto a stargirl black. sus preguntas no son unicas amigo, todas sus preguntas son practicamente iguales a las de la original y las respuestas son muy parecidas, yo ya cheque todas sus preguntas y la mayoria son identicas a las de la verdadea stargirl. y he ahi el problema, el nick es lo de menos pero el pex es eso, que no tiene originalidad para sus preguntas y si no me crees ahi te dejo un link de la original y autentica para que compares:
( P.D. checa desde sus primeras preguntas y veras que son las mismas)
http://mx.answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=AgfMMiB5SmuLgX0lgQzpCy6K8gt.?show=e7009fc2bb2aca014d7a7e8fb9c07100aa
2006-09-29 22:37:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋