2006-09-29 13:26:03 · 17 answers · asked by queen_mar_mar 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
its ok.
2006-09-29 13:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Harry Potter books are excellent. The films are excellent. Harry (the character) is becoming a right stroppy teenager and is starting to get on my nerves a bit but then, that's typical of most teenagers - he's just going through his "Kevin" phase. The lad that plays Harry was a sweetie when he was in the first film but he seems to have beome a bit smug now he's slightly older, as an actor - I don't think he's got any particularly amazing talent except that he looks like the Harry Potter we all imagine from the books. The boy that plays Ron Weesley, however is a fantstic actor - far superior to Daniel Radcliffe. (That's my opinion anyway, I'm sure they'll be thousands oof people out there who disagree with me!)
2006-09-30 03:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by joby 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harry Potter is great as a character, if he were real, he'd be a great example of a classic good person who will be a great man.
Daniel Radcliffe is a great young actor. Unlike so many others, he actually has talent. In the first two movies, he was a little iffy, but thanks to all the wonderful and talented actors he's been working with, he's really learned his trade. He's more than a pretty face (and he is pretty! ^_^), which is something you see so rarely in most of today's actors. I hope that we see much more from Dan after Harry Potter ends. Unfortunately, he's going to have to really work to get rid of the "That's Harry Potter"
comments, so many will stick to him when they see him in a new trailer.
2006-09-29 13:42:29 · answer #3 · answered by Suraya 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sad to say that I've become a bit obssessed with Harry Potter. I love the movies but I love the books even more. As for Dan I think he's doing a good job. If they picked somebody else it would just be wrong. He is Harry and no one else can take that away.
2006-09-29 15:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by Becky 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Harry Potter. As for the boy who plays the character, I think he fits in quite nicely.
2006-09-29 13:30:47 · answer #5 · answered by jupiter FIVE 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Daniel is good as Harry Potter, only gripe is that he does not have green eyes like the fictional character. He has improved alot since the first movie and is good at the emotional scenes now.
I love the books and think the films good as have good British actors, but the plots have been axed to cut running time of the films.
2006-09-29 21:11:13 · answer #6 · answered by celene s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love Harry Potter and I think that Daniel Radcliff does an excellent job in playing him.
2006-09-29 23:55:07 · answer #7 · answered by snowfoxx71 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ofcourse, Harry Potter Series is Fantastic, the books are too good. J.K.Rowling has done a very decent job with those books.,
the movies dont cover every aspect in the book, they just cant. and as for the the actor, i think all the actors fit in the characters perfectly.
Dan is doing it good enough.
2006-09-29 13:36:41 · answer #8 · answered by Napster 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a lot cuter when he was younger. He seems too old now. I don't know how they can continue with him as Harry for the next 2 movies.
2006-09-29 13:35:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I LIKE HARRY POTTER..THE GUY WHO PLAYS HIM IS CUTE..AND THE MOVIES ARE REALLY GOOD.
2006-09-29 13:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by N@NCY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i actually LOVE the movies. the books are alright. i can never really pay attention to them though because they are so long and time consuming. the last one that came out was pretty good...
and about harry((or the person who plays him)), he has def. aged...
2006-09-29 13:31:54 · answer #11 · answered by mac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋