IS IT TRUE THaT BUSH HAD CHILD SEX RING CONNECTIONS!?

Question

source: http://www.freewebs.com/childsexalert

In May 94 the Discovery Channel was Pressured by Congress Not to Air this Video-The child Sex Ring That Reached Bush SR at the Whitehouse and the linkage of Franklin to some of this country’s top politicians in Washington, and in the US Congress, with particular attention on those who attended parties held by Larry King at his Washington mansion on Embassy Row and are secretly being continued today by and through the CIA.
.
.

The story involves children from orphanages in Nebraska being flown around the United States by top Republican officials in order to engage in child sex orgies with America's ruling elite. It is a fact that during the 1980's, child sexual services were provided by top Republican officials to key, bureaucrats and diplomats but most importantly, there is a chilling proximity of all of these events and personalities, to the President of the United States at the time, George H.W. Bush. And there have been victims who claim that the President himself engaged in the activities. It is a tale of child sex, murder, espionage, blackmail, and huge payoffs. And all the players are involved. From the White House to the CIA to the media barrons to the Republican elite - right down to the orphanages where they procured their victims.

Answer 1

Since a story of this magnitude never made it's way into mainstream media, I would doubt the credibility of the story. The liberal media would eat this kind of stuff up.

Answer 2

Connections? Probably. Aren't we all just six degrees from anything or anybody? That is how they make these connections, you know. Politics is such a dirty, filthy, crappy body that anyone who get anywhere will have the Six Degree thing connected. The only credence I give something as you describe relates to the question, "Why does George give in to everything Pres. Fox of Mexico wants?" Why is he apparently prepared to give the country away? I always joke that Mexico must have something on him and his brother - but not dad, apparently. Like, perhaps photos of 20 something George doing girls - or boys? - under 18. Could be. Mexico was a popular destination when father's wanted to break in their teenage boys.
But no, George, does not have any direct connections to a child sex ring. However, we all do if someone targets us and subjects us to the Six Degrees phenomena. Think about it.

Answer 3

Just because someone posts something on an internet website does not mean it's true. People lie all the time, especially about politics, and most especially liberals & Democrats. Stop being a liberal for a moment and use your brain ... do you really think the media could be pressured by anyone to not publish a story this big if it was really true? It would be the story of the century, but it wasn't because it's a bucket of hogwash.

Answer 4

Crap like this isn't helping the Liberal cause. It reminds me about all those Clinton murder conspiracies Right Wing loonies spouted off.

Conservatives have been winning in the last few years because they have successfully convinced many independant voters that Liberals are out of touch with reality. Michael Moore, PETA, and crap like this doesn't help.

We need to cut ourselves off from the fringe and stick to real issues that real people care about. You know, like helping the working class, health care, foreign policy, etc.

Answer 5

Yes, it's all true, as described by the Franklin cover-up.
It's all a part of how secrets are kept.
If someone in the US government says something out of line, then their sexual activities with children is exposed.
This is how the Illuminati manage to keep things like 9/11 covered up. No-one dare speak out. There is no way to get a senior government position without taking part in these satanic rituals.

Answer 6

Probably not. Maybe adult prostitution, but nothing that illegal. Though I wouldn't be surprised if the Saudi royals have a child sex ring.

Answer 7

possibly

Answer 8

haha, ur a funny guy. to answer ur question, NO

number one thing for an agrument: source
number two: evidence

Answer 9

It really wouldn't surprise me!

Answer 10

Don't you wish...