English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is Avro Arrow, is it truly Canadian, how many people lost jobs when Canada gave up on the arrow....

2006-09-29 12:16:43 · 4 answers · asked by lightwayvez 2 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

The cost. If the Arrow had been put into production, then there would have been no money for the rest of the air force, plus the navy and army. Only a massive tax increase could have given those services more mone -- and what government would ever raise taxes substantially?

In retrospect, it was a fine machine, lots of power -- but with relatively short range.

2006-09-30 03:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by Willster 5 · 0 0

The Arrow replace right into a huge could desire to-have-been. that's hassle-free to look at it with rose colored glasses, inspite of the incontrovertible fact that it had many shortfalls and and annoying circumstances earlier than it until now it replace into serviceable. Plus interior the top, we in no way mandatory it nor the CF-101s we've been given instead. The Arrow had poor selection, did no longer have the NORAD SAGE pc, and did no longer have a functioning weapons gadget (even Vietnam era Sparrows have been marginal in action), and would not have tailored nicely to a multi function plane. maximum in all probability, the weapons bay could have been switched over into one greater gas tank and missiles could have been fastened on pylons, erasing any overall performance benefit it had. it would not have been a Mach 3 plane without an huge remodel, no longer the least of which could have been completely new engines that could desire to stand up to the duct temperatures of Mach 3 flight. maximum planes are temperature constrained, no longer thrust constrained. you could blame weight loss software, yet extremely it replace into in easy terms hindsight that vilifies him. The human beings cancelled the XF-108 Rapier and XB-70 and the British the TSR2 on value/income grounds. in easy terms hindsight revealed that with the great inflation of the 70s that each and every could have been greater low value than their inferior replacements. yet yet, their replacements have been reliable at what they did. The RAF rejected the Buccaneer, designed the TSR2, then went to the F-111, then wound up procuring the Buccaneer ten years later and it served for yet another 2 many years. The downfall of Canadian Aviation? Are you kidding me? The Orenda engineers went to United plane of Canada, and made a greater humble yet greater technically no longer hassle-free (simply by small tolerances) and enduring engine.... the PT6, the main universal turbine engine interior the international! After that got here the PW100 and PW300. Others went to De Havilland Canada and worked on the Caribou, Buffalo, sprint 7, and sprint 8. Others went to Canadair and worked on the Yukon, CL-215, Challenger, and CRJ. As for the Avro production facility in Malton? It made wings for DC-9 and MD-80 plane from the 60s until the 90s. It replace into in easy terms demolished some years in the past.

2016-12-12 17:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because canada joined AMericas starwars defense

2006-09-29 12:19:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We may never know for certain. I cannot believe it was merely a cost overrun.

2006-09-29 12:24:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers