I'm trying to get Heap. I'm thinking of giving up both B.Watson and H.Miller for him. I also have Shockey.But do you think i'm giving him too much u think i should offer just one of those 2 TE's. This week Watson and Heap are even if you look at their matchups.
2006-09-29 11:29:17 · 11 answers · asked by youncease 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
The reason why i have 3 TE is I Drafted Shockey and Miller who are both on byes so i needed to pick up a TE. Watson was too good to be left on waivers so i picked him up.
2006-09-29 16:44:53 · update #1
No, that is not a good trade. If you can get Heap for either one then that is a good trade. But not both.
2006-09-29 11:33:05 · answer #1 · answered by Mama of two 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why on earth do you have 3 TEs?
Ben Watson is the number 1 option is the NE passing game. He is realistically every bit as valuable as Heap, Shockey, or Miller.
Heap is a very nice tight end, but sending Watson and Miller is overpaying. I'm not sure why the other owner would need both guys, unless you are in a 2 TE mandatory league.
Heap has a bum ankle, so be careful what you wish for...
2006-09-29 19:28:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why you have 3 TEs, unless you are in a league where there is a TE slot and a WR/TE slot so you put Shockey and Miller in those 2 and have Watson as back-up. Dude...first of all, that trade sucks for you. You are givng up Miller, who is just as good as Heap and Watson, whoas of right now is Brady's favorite target for Heap. Keep Miller and Shockey. Try Watson for Heap, if he rejects it, try Shockey for Heap, if he rejects that, forget him. Your TEs don't need a upgrade.
Good luck to you!!!
btw, Sports King has a point.
2006-09-29 21:05:07 · answer #3 · answered by The Fantasy King 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heap is the most underated TE. I've had him onmy team the past three seasons and he never fails. I would trade Shockey for Heap as he (Shockey) is too inconsistant and injury prone. The other two, Watson and Miller are both decent tight ends but I would definitely trade Shockey over those too for Heap. Heap= heaps of scores with McNair, who loves the TE, behind the reigns of Baltimore.
2006-09-29 18:44:51 · answer #4 · answered by Mace 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give him two of your TE's but demand Heap plus a WR for that trade. Interesting draft strategy, though, to end up with basically three of the top six or seven TE's.
2006-09-29 20:45:28 · answer #5 · answered by stacks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
However injury-prone shockey is, he always produces... and in big numbers. Look for Watson to get more looks from Brady in the coming weeks. I say don't make the trade.
2006-09-29 18:54:53 · answer #6 · answered by PTAT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever you do, do not put alot of trust in shockey...seems he is always hurt...I think watson is a better pick up than miller..brady has no recievers he can go to and dillon his struggling
2006-09-29 18:36:03 · answer #7 · answered by garetson070398 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watson is Brady favorit target so what ever you do dont trade him. Heath Miller is Bens favorit target so dont trade him. Try trading Shocky he isent Elis favorit target (paxico is and amani tommer is his 2 favorit target),and Shocky is an injurey machine if you can get shocky for heap thats like trading an ok TE for a good TE.So try that,and trust me you wont be desopointed.
2006-09-29 18:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by J.G. Racing Domination 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would just do Heath Miller for Todd Heap. TE's are so hit and miss, you never know how most will fair each week.
2006-09-29 18:41:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are giving way to much for Heap..I'm thinknig of benching him myself, he is always hurt in some way shape or form.
2006-09-29 18:52:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋