I think they are very delusional if they believe that. I guess they must have some secret evidence that non of the rest of us are privy to.
2006-09-29 10:55:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
He will never actually be tried for war crimes. But it can be argued in almost every war that both sides commit "war crimes". After World War II, it was stated by people within the US military, that if we had lost to Japan, we would probably be tried for war crimes. This is because we did a lot of bombings with the main purpose being to kill civilians, not military targets. So in most cases, whoever wins the war doesn't get any war crimes. Now there is obviously the intent of the law. Nazis faced war crime trials because they obviously did very inhumane acts with a purpose of killing. I don't think Bush is doing this.
2006-09-29 11:15:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Liberals and Conservatives ..... I just do not get it when will this country embrace a third party that is in the middle and all these petty questions regarding one or the other will disappear.
No George will not be tried for war crimes. Losers are tried for war crimes. Read your history books (Nuremberg Trials = Germany = Loser)
2006-09-29 10:58:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by S R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Come on. No one believes that. He did the best he could with the information provided. I'm very liberal and I believe that. Someone should be held responsible and he's the one in charge, but it has become a true field of expertise in politics in this world to pass the buck effectively until everyone forgets about it.
2006-09-29 15:06:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the place do you get this rubbish? Are you incredibly attempting to assert that the yankee President is accountable of all this? What bearing directly to the people we are combating? How nicely do you think of they're abiding by utilising the Geneva convention? Your question is an absurd humorous tale and your loss of sophistication is disgraceful. SO - I think of which you anti- conflict supporters think of we are shooting at sturdy form-hearted harmless people over in Iraq now - appropriate?
2016-12-15 17:02:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by tramble 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you do the crime you should do the time, George will weasel out of it, but he should face an international trial for the crimes that he has committed starting with starting the war in Iraq in the first place.
2006-09-29 11:00:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are enough delusional people out there who admire him, where I have no illusions that Bush will face any charges. It doesn't mean he is innocent, though.
2006-09-29 11:04:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
sense of what? you keep harping on a lack of morals...
what do you call someone that wages a war against a nation that wasn't a threat?
what do you call someone who wants to torture people?
the truth is, you don't have any sense. clinton perjured himself... but bush has never been asked to testify under oath, even after 9-11. roosevelt was investigated after pearl harbor nine times, what gives?
and somehow, you think this is comparable with lying about a ******* that someone offered you freely? grow up and stop obsessing over willy's willy!
2006-09-29 10:58:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by uncle osbert 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
The great George W. Bush? You must be delusional. The only thing great about him is his great ignorance.
2006-09-29 10:55:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Definitely delusional! They think Slick Willie was a great president! Yeah, grate like two bricks rubbing together!
2006-09-29 10:59:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
1⤊
2⤋