The Movie? Absolutely NOT. I just hope someone will love me that way someday.
2006-09-29 10:33:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by to_sassy4_u 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No i think that the Notebook is a very romanic movie
2006-09-29 10:36:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by sarahgirl105 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually I beloved it plenty as a results of time period in which it happened and the way they dealt with the undertaking of having older. yet possibly it really is only me. My mum and dad are about that age. both leads must have had some type of chemistry - they dated in genuine existence after that. BA: Casablanca, Ever After, Love actually (it somewhat is extra of a comedy-romance yet an impressive action picture).
2016-11-25 02:57:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really like romantic comedies, i always find them cheesy and too much to take. But this film, I loved. The actors have amazing chemistry, the story is good and there's some gorgeous cinematography.
2006-09-29 10:47:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by NutterButter 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If anything we need more movies like that to remind us that true love is out there and that ... that kinda love is still out there... people these days have lost hope in finding that kind of connection and it's obvious in the rising number of divorce. So to answer your question NO it is no over rated. Love the movie.
2006-09-29 10:37:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Soonie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Coming from a guy, yes it is. Go see the Koran version, it is the original.
2006-09-29 10:48:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Voodoo Experience 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it's a great movie. I don't like romantic movies but i loved this one.
2006-09-29 10:42:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may be....but we would all like for that to be true at some point in our lives.
2006-09-29 10:47:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by islanddragon30 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. Why are weak people so celebrated?
2006-09-29 10:39:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by xamayca.com 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
very much so,just for the tear factor
2006-09-29 10:39:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋