Nobody. There were no large passenger jets.
No plane hit the Pentagon
There were no plane engines, so none are missing
Thermite was placed there in preparation for controlled demolition
Increase puts because of inside knowledge
Evidence sold to hide the truth
There were no cell phone calls, passengers, hijackers or planes
Rodriguez offered money to hide the truth
Towers fell at the speed of gravity due to controlled demolition
Fire fighters are not blind
Silverstein let the cat out of the bag
I belive thermite, or thermate has been disovered on a recovered piece of steel rubble.
Detailed 9/11 research work
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/research.html
2006-09-30 17:27:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Based on previous research and responses I've provide here:
Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
A: Which 9 ? Where are they? Where's their interrogation interview? NO PROOF.
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
A: Did you take your measuring tape out that day? The hole was just a bit smaller than the one in your head for suggesting anything but a plane (ON VIDEO!) hit the Pentagon. NO PROOF.
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
A: The flashpoint temperature of the average commercial jet laden with 90%+ of its fuel is much higher than 2700F, and on top of that, what would have survived the pulverization of 110 floors of concrete. If the WTC could not withstand that impact and heat, how could a little Pratt & Whitney engine? NO PROOF.
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
A: Finally a reasonable question. Some may contend that the design of the WTC, like many urban skyscrapers, includes compartmentalized interior/core columns that can house detonation substances. HOWEVER, assuming the substances were there, they would have been planted either during construction (and therefore some degradation of the material may have occurred more than likely) or during the '93 bombing investigation. However, most demolition requires compromising the steel structures beforehand, and applying detonation as the 'last straw'. This requires magnesium strips along the applied thermite, deep in the core of the structure, and then some mechanism to ignite the magnesium. This method, as it concerns the twin towers, is a long shot. The question remains whether wtc7 was demolished after the damage it suffered, or collapsed. But the damage suffered by wtc7 was due to debris from wtc 1 & 2, and it was clear that neither the building (nor the site) was going to be salvaged. The fate of wtc7 is a non-starter.
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01?
A: The increase in put options was tantamount to about $3million, and had been unclaimed, likely to due to the cessation of trading in NYSE imposed by the SEC. NO PROOF.
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
A: The investigation of Ground Zero debris took over two years and pieces were meticulously loaded and carted on to debris trucks with armed escorts to a location in Staten Island, not China. Any sale of material to any nation was done after this investigation took place.
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Tests have been conducted which indicate some reception from local providers up to 8000 ft in altitude. The assumption is the passengers used a cell phone (and not an in-flight phone). Suspicion is commercial aviation is 70+ years old and they've figured out numerous ways to contact officials (company and government) on the ground by then. NO PROOF.
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
A: You have no proof shown here of who offered how much to William Rodriguez, who has spoken to the press, FBI, and 9/11 commission and all parties did not find his story plausible or warranting further action (he also said he saw one of the hijackers casing the WTC about 3 months prior). If a thermite detonation did occur seconds before the plane hit the North Tower, why did it take about an hour to collapse? This does not make sense in terms of the physical stresses placed on a building with the complete inner core compromised by the thermite blase (the explosion caused fire to shoot 'up or down' from the elevator shaft, burning one of Rodriguez's coworkers, with 14 witnesses to the event). Until you can explain how a 110 story tower stands upright after the basement supports are compromised, I can't find plausibility in this assertion. NO PROOF.
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
The South Tower's floors above the impact zone fell over (not down) as the building collapsed. If you've reviewed the engineering schematic of the buildings, they are loosely tied floors to steel skeleton and inner beams. The floors were light-weight and flexible attached to the inner and outer structures and therefore you'd see significant acceleration of these floors as they pancaked, essentially as if the building fell through air with no resistance (i.e. gravity).
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?
A: See 2nd link below, this firefigher HEARD explosions after sending some of their squad up to the highest floor the one working elevator would take them to. The explosions were heard, not seen. In a burning building, constructed such as the twin towers were, explosions are not out of the norm (flashovers are also typical). This is likely what was witnessed, albeit from ground level (see 3rd link below). If detonation was employed, it would be at the inner core and closer to the base of the building, not the middle of it (in plain sight from ground level) as the fireman interviewed (3rd link below) asserts. AGAIN NO PROOF.
I had worked in the South Tower for almost two years. I know the floors were very lightweight, flexible and able to house all sorts of wires and piping to enable computer and phone systems to be easily installed or repaired. The building swayed and shook with a strong wind, and was clearly built to withstand natural pressures, not exploding planes and pulverized concrete pancaking.
I know it is difficult to imagine that this event could take place on our soil, given our military and law enforcement apparatus. But our complacency and political hopscotching put our country in a precarious position, way BEFORE 9/11. This is a trying event for our generation and the history of our country. As fun and intriguing as it may be to point to internal conspiracies, the reality is that four planes were hijacked and run into targets or the ground that day. They were piloted by maniacal and homicidal individuals with no value placed on human life. The transgressor here is radical Islam. THAT movement bears all responsibility, and trying to concoct an internally executed conspiracy with flimsy references to unsubstantiated claims is a poor way to show your support for those who died and for those who are following and capturing the perpetrators who are still alive (none of the hijackers have been found alive to date).
2006-09-29 10:03:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by rohannesian 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
have you ever considered what steel and aluminum does fantastic a stable wall at 4 hundred mph? super systems make loud noises whilst in rigidity because of hearth and different forces. bypass lower back to you national enquirer and get in the main appropriate class.
2016-10-18 05:19:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋