English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-29 08:25:42 · 21 answers · asked by J.D 1 in Sports Football (American)

21 answers

No, too many wimps out there can't handle the cold!
They will never put a dome in Green Bay. The cold is part of what makes a Packer game fun! Not to mention, helps keep the beer cold. Never had a warm beer in Green Bay! Love them Pack!

2006-09-29 08:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

NO!! The city is to small to support all of the fans who will descend on it. And also it seems to be a running theme that the Super-Bowl is played in a warmer atmosphere, or a Dome, so unless the great city of Green Bay decides to build a Dome, or a ginormous wall along Canada to keep all the cold stuff up there, I have to say no.

2006-09-29 08:38:11 · answer #2 · answered by dale m 2 · 0 0

Due to climate its very doubtful, the superbowl committee look for several determining factors as to where the superbowl is played and of course the city has a committe that tries to sell their beloved city to be the future site of the super bowl. Since Green Bay is a very very cold climate and well not an attractive tourism site at that time of year City of Green Bay hosting the superbowl is slim

2006-09-30 09:13:34 · answer #3 · answered by Douglas N 1 · 0 0

unfortunately, and most likely no, the nfl is all about the greenbacks. they use the superbowl to entertain and court big corporate sponsors, so what is better, a nice warm climate in february, or a frigid one. personally i would like to see the superbowl on a rotating basis, such as at an nfl teams stadium every year, places like green bay, cleveland, pittsburgh, cincinnati etc.etc. not only would it help these cities out, but would provide extra incentive for winning, (not that teams need any other incentive)imagine, lord forbid (can u tell i'm not a pitt fan)
pittsburgh in a superbowl at there own stadium or possibly green bay in lambeau in a superbowl. the idea is exciting, but the nfl is a big sell out to corporate dollars, so that could only be left to the imagination.. shame on the nfl

2006-09-29 11:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by betterthenmost 2 · 0 0

Even with a dome the city is too small to hold a Super Bowl. People were complaining about Jacksonville being too small (not enough hotel rooms) there's just no way.

2006-09-29 10:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only if they get a dome. The Super Bowl is only played in warm climates (such as Miami) or in a dome stadium in northern climates (like Minnesota's HHH Metrodome).

2006-09-29 08:30:41 · answer #6 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0 0

if you look at what the NFL wanted Kansas City to do by building a roof on Arrowhead Stadium to get a superbowl, I don't think so just because Lambeau field won't be the same frozen tundra with a roof or dome.

2006-09-29 08:32:28 · answer #7 · answered by football23 2 · 1 0

If they ever enclose the stadium maybe? Do you think Janet or any other actress or singer wants to expose their headlights in the cold and get run over by a reindeer

2006-09-29 08:30:55 · answer #8 · answered by kendo2_2000 4 · 0 0

No, it's too cold in February in Wisconsin. Maybe if they built a dome stadium.

2006-09-29 08:28:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Superbowl held in Greenbay??? In JANUARY!!! Not a chance.sorry

2006-09-29 08:33:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers