English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've noticed that when they bring up historical facts that are twisted and very misleading. Is this planned, or are they completely uneducated. Some have said it may be drug related I don't know.

2006-09-29 08:01:58 · 18 answers · asked by marcus93257 2 in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

actually...

Liberals have a difficult time engaging in intellectual debate against a republican platform, so... they have to engage in falsehoods and rhetoric to hide or distract the public from the true issue/debate.

2006-09-29 08:03:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

4

2006-09-29 08:20:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Marcus, you make a lot of assumptions in your statement/question. Number one, not all Democrats are liberals, some are conservatives. Number two, Democrats have a history of having very educated representatives who I am sure know their history. Number three., where do you get off making a drug related statement using the source "some have said"?

Maybe I should state: Does Marcus purposely put down the Democrats because he is drugged and forgets facts and really does not know anything about them??

Get your own facts straight before you ask your question and make your question sensible and meaningful, you are a poor representative of a Republican if that is what you are.

2006-09-29 08:08:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You have asked a misleading question. It is not Dem/Libs that distort history, but rather it is almost all politicians (99.99%) who distort history to suit their own ends

Facts are only things that get in the way of political gain and therefore must be altered to have the greatest effect for the politician.

2006-09-29 08:13:15 · answer #4 · answered by Seikilos 6 · 0 0

How many of us have so sharp a memory that we can quote facts without refreshing our memory with the facts? Of course we should know what the facts are before we refer to an issue.

2006-09-29 08:07:11 · answer #5 · answered by debop44 3 · 0 1

"Facts" and "History" are relative in the present. You must wait at least 25-50 years to actually peel away enough of the corruption onion, before you start to actually get to the core of "FACTS". For example, Kennedy assasination, King assasination? Still haven't come up with enough "FACTS" to satisfy HISTORY.

2006-09-29 08:04:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

They use whatever they can to make a political point. There are hours of audio footage of various democrats discussing the threat Iraq was to the US: Clinton, Kerry, Harry Reid, etc.

Liberals are all about power over us. They do not care about anyone but themselves.

2006-09-29 08:04:33 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2 1

Do you honestly think this is a quality only fitting a singular political party? Are you really that naive? Or is this your feeble attempt at goading a agitated response from a uneducated viewer, such as yourself? I don't appreciate your ruse.

2006-09-29 08:07:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i don't think of this would be a liberal component. i think of it quite is totally a human component. all of us tend to bear in strategies issues in a constructive mild to our own comments. I easily have considered many conservatives do a similar component, and it drives me nuts. i've got faith in fact, and fake claims via the two section only pollute the communicate frequently. the effort-free actuality is that many everybody isn't arranged to look after the actuality and customarily react in one in all 3 manners. a million. forget approximately in regards to the full remember and shop mum. If some thing you have believed to be real seems to be proved fake only pretend like it in no way got here approximately and which you in no way reported something in the 1st place. 2. Deny the actuality. no remember what data are presented. Deny! Deny! Deny! 3. in case you may't dispel the message alongside with your data, attack the different section strongly in an attempt to discredit the messenger. The progression is easy. Rule a million first, if that would not artwork use Rule 2. If Rule 2 fails immediately impose using Rule 3. proceed to apply Rule 3 till your opponent is defeated, or only is going away in frustration. the two way you win via default.

2016-10-18 05:10:58 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Someday we will have a cure for dyslexia. Until then try to do things with a lot less responsibilty.

2006-09-29 08:13:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers