I am more conservative, but yes, the extremes of both are insane. I agree with you, i don't think one or the other is the correct way to go, but each has its advantages
2006-09-29 07:20:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
2 wings on an identical poultry has been a reliable factor interior the previous whilst the two wings found out that they had to artwork mutually as a fashion to get the poultry everywhere constructive. the priority we've could be that between the wings believes it has each and every of the solutions and is punctiliously against working with its counterpart. as a consequence the "poultry" is floundering and getting nowhere constructive. What we desire is for our flesh pressers to enhance up and COMPROMISE ... COMPROMISE ... COMPROMISE.
2016-12-12 17:26:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm with "notme", I love the constution first then the country because without it we have no country. The far right is trying to chip away at the only thing that protects us as citizen of this great country. We need to rember that always. I am for balance in the government to much power to either party is no good.
2006-09-29 07:34:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by DEEJay 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree. As much as I wish it wasn't the case, any radical in any party is blinded to the larger picture. Extremists must realize they have to cater to both sides of the spectrum rather than attempting to further their own interests. I am affiliated with a political party, I am a college student, and I vote in elections. I would much rather see a moderate of either party in office than an extremist from my own party.
2006-09-29 07:26:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nik 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The one good thing about bipartisan politics, is that every issue gets a voice from one side of the other. The major downfall is that neither side listens. You're right, of course, career politicians engage in politics; it's unfortunately how things get done, if they get done at all.
2006-09-29 07:21:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are what is called a moderate. It's the only sensible way to be. Moderates tend to support what's good for the country, not what some party boss tells them.
2006-09-29 08:21:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Politicians are always ready like chameleon to change their colour.Did you ever notice what happened after soviet union broke up.The staunchest commies became staunchest cappis in one second.It is the circumstances that directs whole drama.
2006-09-29 07:27:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not in it for myself. I'm in it for whats good for all of us based on the constitution. The right has gone too far, and it needs to be reigned in.
2006-09-29 07:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by notme 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yup, they both are far to greedy and both take their party's interest above the country's.
2006-09-29 07:20:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-29 07:20:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Privratnik 5
·
2⤊
0⤋