Absolutely the Democrats have offered no strategy for fighting terrorism. Unless we count their "pull our troops out of Iraq ", you know the popular "Cut and run strategy." That would give the Islamists a stunning victory over the world's greatest military power. That's the strategy. Just how do you think that one would work out for us?
All we hear from the Dem's and Libs is" Well .. Bush hasn't caught Osama bin Laden yet". Well, guess what? The Allies never captured Adolf Hitler or Tojo during World War II. Does that mean we didn't prevail? After the Germans were routed did the "loyal" opposition in this country start screaming that we hadn't captured Hitler yet? Fact is, we never got him. He managed to take himself out before we could get to him. I guess that means we failed.
Democrats are still pounding on that National Intelligence Estimate .. .you remember, the one that says many radical Muslims got ticked off when we started killing radical Muslims .. and so they came to help out. Funny how the Democrats don't seem to mention the fact that that very same National Intelligence Estimate says that if the US prevails in Iraq it will mean a huge decrease in Islamic radicalism. The Democrats don't want to mention that because they don't want to prevail in Iraq.
See how easy this is when you just stop to noodle it all out?(Boortz)
2006-09-29 07:33:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. The Democrat party has become the "intelligent resolution" party. The Republican party has become the "kill them all" party...only interested in causing as much death and destruction as possible.
Just look at how well Iraq is going. We are failing miserably and even the Republican based NIC have said that we are creating more terrorists than we are killing.
You should also look at what DU does. You will quickly see that it is a weapon of mass destruction with implications to the very survival of the Arabic people...to all life in the middle east! Bush may turn out to have killed more people than all tyrants and evil dictators throughout history combined!
These people in office are willing to commit genocide for a profit...and they have. Dems aren't about "cut and run"...they are about intelligent, workable solutions.
How many times do you have to hit someone in the face vefore they start liking you? 0. Every time you hit someone, they will like you less. Anyone that doesn't get that is just a moron. We have been hitting the people of the middle east for the last century. You wonder why they don't like us? You wouldn't like us either if you were in their situation!
Democrats have offered many solutions. It's the Republicans who have no plan other than "stay the course of losing"
2006-09-29 07:05:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by corwynwulfhund 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
They formed earlier Obama grew to develop into president. They began out as Ron Paul supporters. The stream took off after TARP. they in simple terms weren't ordinary as Tea activities yet. fairly some Conservatives recognized (grudgingly, like myself), even earlier 9/11, Bush develop into no longer a monetary Conservatives and spent funds like mad. the reason the Tea party stream worked develop into because this simmering over spending develop into shared through fairly some those who ultimately reached a tipping element of being bored to death with both the Left and suitable of the country, realized authorities wasn't going to provide the answer so the individuals had to. Tea party rallies were an confirmation that precise members were no longer on my own in there thoughts. there develop right into a sense of community.
2016-12-04 00:59:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fox News is the mouthpiece for the Republican Party unfortunately. If you want some un-biased views, read the news from the BBC or Japan or elsewhere out of the country. They are quite a bit more accurate, and the Democratic Party is being hailed as the sane people of the US...
2006-09-29 06:49:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Absolutely not. It all depends upon your point of view. If you believe that we have the right to just be over in Iraq indefinitely, if you believe that we should ignore what the majority of Iraqi citizens themselves are calling for, if you believe that we should ignore what the majority of American citizens (who, after all, are paying for this war!) are calling for, if you believe that any and all criticism of the current administration's policies constitutes being a traitor, aiding the "terrorists", and being unpatriotic, if you believe that the American people do not deserve to have answers to their doubts and questions surrounding our purpose in Iraq, if you believe that the American people and the world's people do not deserve any explanation for the fact that it has been overwhelmingly proven that there was no link between Saddam Hussein and: WMDs, Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden!!!... If you believe all of these things, then i guess that it follows logically that you would also be willing to categorize any person or party who believes any or all of the above as a "party of cut and run".
2006-09-29 06:55:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Never listen to a politician when trying to gain factual knowledge! They are filled with "spin" (that is politically correct for B.S.). Elections ar in November, and the balance of power is at stake, so remember to factor what they say, and watch what they do. (have you ever wondered why they so so much, but do so little?)
Have a great day,
Lonnie
2006-09-29 06:50:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Bush is grappling for support. He's trying anything to take attention off of his mistakes. The Democratic party is trying to save America.
2006-09-29 06:49:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
It looks like President Bush's party is practicing cut and run,as in they are cutting and running from him and the war.Republicans no Allegiance at all?
2006-09-29 07:01:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by kman1830 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Andrew Jackson is the father of the Demo's and the foremost American cut and run President.
He killed thousands of Indians in the Southeastern United States. He would sweep in (Old Hickory) kill and run.
After the trail of tears massacre. Georgia and the Carolina's were opened up to white settlers.
Georgian NeoCons can thank Andrew Jackson's kill and run policies for the land they live on today.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-29 06:57:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
First off... using Fox News isn't exactly the best of sources.
"Cut and run" is a term being used as propaganda. Acknowledging the mistakes, coming up with a strategy to hand Iraq back over to the Iraqi's, bringing our soldiers home... none of this has the same negative tone as "cut and run" does.
2006-09-29 06:50:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by misskate12001 6
·
6⤊
2⤋