Let's see if Repubicans can answer this question without bringing up Clinton. I suspect their position on this is so weak that they will not be able to resist it.
Bush himself refused to answer the question this week.
2006-09-29 06:38:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Accept money from his family.
Shook their hands.
2006-09-29 06:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not a Republican, but Bush 1) made Bid Laden go into hiding, 2) kept Iraq and Afghanistan from being Bin Laden's hiding places 3) forced "neutral" countries from offering Bin Laden amnesty.
They have a very weak position, but it is not totally without merit. The real question is whether Iraq or Afghanistan were the ones helping Bin Laden in the first place, and why the government refused to listen to its own military about how to run the invasions.
2006-09-29 06:47:10 · answer #2 · answered by Buffy Summers 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As a republican, I have answered every question on this site, pertaining to the Clinton interview, that Clinton didn't recognize the threat of bin Laden. I don't know why he answered the questions the way he did. Puzzling...
As to Bush, and any other presidency, the first 8 months are not great times to start a war, but I wish he had...
2006-09-29 06:44:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
what has he done about Bin lAden with ANY part of his presidency? I don't think the point is to disarm him. The point SHOULD be to make him accountable for the lives he had a hand in taking! So we just let him go ahead and take those lives, as long as he doesn't take anymore? Sounds like Churchill's dealings with Hitler...
2006-09-29 06:48:49 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The same thing Bill Clinton did during his entire EIGHT years as President absolutly nothing constructive.
So what happens when you follow the actions of a Democrat?
2006-09-29 06:58:38 · answer #5 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What did clinton do for 8 years?
nothing
2006-09-29 07:12:42 · answer #6 · answered by dannavy85 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He put Bin Laden on the run where he has become, in essence, a non-impact to today's global issues.
Thanks for asking. I should get the 10 points for succeeding your test. No mention of Slick Willy on my answer.
2006-09-29 06:42:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He met with Bin Laden to plan the ultimate demise of the keebler elves. His ultimate diabolical plan. I HAVE PROOF!!!
Sad but true.
2006-09-29 06:42:41 · answer #8 · answered by SVern 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you tell us what should have been done that wasn't? We have people Bitching and complaining right now about Loosing there personal freedoms ect. Now exactly how do you think these same people would have Acted WITHOUT 911 to base all these changes on. They probably would have bitched even louder.
2006-09-29 06:47:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Carried on the policies and programs that were already in place when he arrived. Were working on a larger, more comprehensive policy.
2006-09-29 06:50:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He closed all his money making venues and made him run for his life. Your question is not hard to answer and has been asked and answered several times before. Nice try!
2006-09-29 06:46:06 · answer #11 · answered by jamie s 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋