It would show just who they really are NAZIS, who are against, minoriteis, the poor, the middle class, an Unions. Republicans are for zionist arab slaughtering jews, that is the difference between them and the nazis of the 30's and 40's, and this time a round the nazi leader is King Bush , and Emperor Chenney
2006-09-29 06:30:59 · 12 answers · asked by Donald D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because we are NOT Nazi's. Make sense?
Donald D- Thanx soooooo much for the vulgar, obscene, insulting, email that you just sent me. I especially loved the part where you called me a D*KE. (I'm not, by the way)Real intellectual and respectful.
Do me a favor and contain yourself to this forum and DO NOT contact me by email again.
YOU are the reason the DELETE button was invented.
2006-09-29 06:37:33 · answer #1 · answered by Diana 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get some anger management classes.so you can regain the ability to think.
Since you clearly feel for the deaths that result from the "Arab/Zionist"fighting,..What Republicans's are or aren't "for" have what value? --
Do you not understand that when people fight people get hurt even die?Both the aggressors and responders MUST CHOOSE to stop the killing...DUH! The alternative is more death maybe the loss of a whole civilization. Check out Mankind's history.
My apologies if you were not born on this planet and asked this question out of ignorance.
2006-09-29 13:56:52 · answer #2 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Donald old buddy; you are in danger of becoming boring. At least in the past your misspelled, insane tirades were somewhat amusing. Now you are just retreading the same tirades of the rest of the wacko tin foil hat liberals. Is your medication kicking in?
At least your grammar is still atrocious, that keeps it fresh.
2006-10-01 13:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
See, there you go getting all confused again. The Nazis were the National SOCIALIST Party. It is the Demorats who are socialists, so they are the ones who should be wearing the arm bands. To quote Slick Willie, "I failed, but I tried."
2006-09-29 13:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
YOU JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
UNIONS STARTED OUT TO HELP THE PEOPLE, BUT ARE NOW DOMINATED BY CROOKS ( I KNOW I WORKED FOR ONE) & ONLY SUPPORT THE DEMS. BUSH IS THE MOST PRO - ISREALI PRESIDENT WE HAVE HAD IN ALONG TIME. THE BUSH TAX CUTS HELPED THE MIDDLE CLASS. DEMS WILL RAISE TAXES ON ANYTHING THAT MOVES. THERE ARE MORE MINORITIES IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THAN THERE WAS UNDER THE SLICKSTER. WHY DON'T DEMS IN CONGRESS JUST COVER THEIR FACES SINCE THEY ARE PRO-TERRORISTS & SEEM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS.
2006-09-29 14:08:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is the silliest thing I have ever heard, just because republicans believe that people should work for themselves and be self sufficient does not mean they are against minorities.
Take your spinster seflf elsewhere
2006-09-29 13:33:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
They thought is would look tacky to pin it on the chest of the dems since there was already a sickle and hammer on them.
2006-10-03 12:05:22 · answer #7 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you are taking a harsh stance against Nazism by implying that you are a socialist? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....
2006-09-29 13:33:45 · answer #8 · answered by Zombie 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Not only that! Why don't they wear little yellow glasses to signify the fact that they are releasing the evil Mr. Potatohead dolls as we speak?
We must fight for our lives!
2006-09-29 13:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by SVern 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
let me explain it to you
communists: government is good!
nazis: government is good!
democrats: government is good!
republicans: government is bad!
See a pattern there?
2006-09-29 13:56:57 · answer #10 · answered by marceldev29 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋