Get, Kill, Outcast terrorists,
but to attack a whole country??
Smells fishy. I think OIL maybe?????
2006-09-29 05:51:36 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
karlkalis..., I'll tell you how.. Its called the AIDS epidemic or willfully killing a whole population through disease and war.
2006-09-30 00:56:27 · update #1
Because after 9 monhts of a completely mediocre term, a footnote of a one-term president decided that a war was just what he needed to get his approval ratings up and the only way to have any hope of being anything more then the result of an insult on the American electoral process. That, and our country was getting stagnant, and what better way to re-spark an interest in politics then by giving us something meaningful to bicker about?
2006-09-29 05:58:20 · answer #1 · answered by rhambass 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
There at the instant are not any 2 worldwide places in the international who ought to win a conflict against the U. S.. whether they have been the two massive worldwide places. the U. S. protection rigidity budget is like 10 situations greater than the protection rigidity budget of the different united states of america.
2016-12-15 16:52:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plenty of Oil in African countries and we don't ever interfere there, how do you explain that? Plenty of Oil in Mexico too.... why haven't we invaded there if we do so only for OIL? Do liberals ever think or do they just repeat what the TV tells them?
2006-09-29 07:22:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Exactly. Why do you think oil prices go up (especially after a horrific incident in Iraq) its because there thoughts that there a defenseless country with a weak power and would be easy to gain control over are flagged.
2006-09-29 05:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by The King 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What better way for a fascist oligarchy to seize and hold power than a never-ending war? Oil is definitely part of the situation.
2006-09-29 05:55:00 · answer #5 · answered by Zombie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mighty mouse like mighty oil. And I believe mighty mouse sits on our throne now. Oh. was it mighty monkey. I lose track with the animal analogies when they all seem to fit.
2006-09-29 12:33:00 · answer #6 · answered by JS 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the countries we attack are uncapable of governing their countries in a responsible way, thus creating a threat to world peace, JACKASS!
2006-09-29 06:03:16 · answer #7 · answered by chefbill 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Have you seen gas prices? It's not about oil. Venezuala would be much easier to take over and they don't belong to OPEC. If it were about oil, we'd go after them.
2006-09-29 05:56:26 · answer #8 · answered by Angel Baby 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they are so defenseless why are thousands dying to protect your dumb a@@? Learn the facts! Oil has nothing to do with stopping a regime that wants nothing more than to eliminate people who don't share their beliefs.
2006-09-29 05:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
George Bush wants to capture and exploit their corn fritters.
How much longer can we stand for this injustice?
2006-09-29 06:00:02 · answer #10 · answered by SVern 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋